Davis v. Wells Fargo, N.A., et al.
Filing
7
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 06/09/16 ORDERING that plaintiff Corceia Davis must file a response to this Order by 06/15/16 SHOWING GOOD CAUSE why her Complaint should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute, in accordance with the Rules of this Court. (Benson, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CORCEIA DAVIS,
12
13
14
15
16
No. 2:16-cv-00890 JAM AC
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
WELLS FARGO, N.A., NBS DEFAULT
SERVICES, LLC, TITLE 365 and DOES 1
THROUGH 20, inclusive,
Defendants.
17
18
Defendant Wells Fargo, N.A., filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint in this matter.
19
ECF 3, and a Request for Judicial Notice of documents, ECF 4, on May 5, 2016. The motions
20
were calendared for hearing on June 15, 2016.
21
Eastern District of California Local Rule (“LR”) 230, which controls the procedures for
22
the court’s calendar and procedure, directs that the opposing party file an opposition to the motion
23
“in writing,” and that such opposition “shall be filed and served not less than fourteen (14) days
24
preceding the noticed . . . hearing date.” If the non-moving party has no opposition to a grant of
25
the motion, they are to “serve and file a statement to that effect, specifically designating the
26
motion in question.” LR 230(c)(emphasis added). Because the hearing date for the Motion to
27
Dismiss is June 15, 2016, the opposition, or statement of non-opposition, was due on June 1,
28
2016. The court has received neither.
1
1
In light of the foregoing, the court orders as follows:
2
Plaintiff Corceia Davis must file a response to this Order showing good cause why her
3
Complaint should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute, in accordance with the Rules of this
4
Court. This filing must occur on or before June 15, 2016.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: June 9, 2016
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?