Jackson v. Calone, et al.

Filing 162

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/16/2018 RESOLVING 159 Motion re Depositions. Due to the undersigned's unavailability on 5/31/2018, any discovery dispute arising from the re-scheduled depositions, including the need for additional deposition sessions, will be specially set for hearing on Monday, 6/4/2018, at 2:00 p.m., with all papers filed by 5/31/2018, at 5:00 p.m. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Mark E. Ellis - 127159 Theresa M. LaVoie - 143773 ELLIS LAW GROUP LLP 1425 River Park Drive, Suite 400 Sacramento, CA 95815 Tel: (916) 283-8820 Fax: (916) 283-8821 mellis@ellislawgrp.com tlavoie@ellislawgrp.com Attorneys for Defendants RICHARD CALONE; CALONE & HARREL LAW GROUP, LLP; CALONE & BEATTIE, LLP; CALONE LAW GROUP, LLP 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 DOROTHY RODDEN JACKSON, 14 Plaintiff, 15 v. 16 Case No.: 2:16-cv-00891 TLN KJN STIPULATION AND ORDER RESOLVING MOTION RE DEPOSITIONS (ECF NO. 159) AND SHORTENING TIME FOR DEPOSITION-RELATED MOTIONS RICHARD CALONE; CALONE & HARREL LAW GROUP, LLP; CALONE & BEATTIE, LLP; CALONE LAW GROUP, LLP, 17 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION AND ORDER RESOLVING MOTION RE DEPOSITIONS (ECF NO. 159) AND SHORTENING TIME FOR DEPOSITION-RELATED MOTIONS 1 Plaintiff has agreed to reschedule Defendants’ depositions to accommodate their schedules to 2 May 22, 2018 (Mr. Calone) and May 29, 2018 (Mr. Harrel). To avoid potential prejudice to Plaintiff, 3 the parties stipulate that any discovery dispute arising from the re-scheduled depositions, including 4 the need for additional deposition sessions, will be set for hearing on May 31, 2018, at 10:00 a.m., 5 with all papers filed twenty-four hours before the hearing. Defendants further agree to be available 6 for further depositions, if necessary, before the discovery cut-off date of June 8, 2018. 7 8 9 10 This stipulation and order will resolve Plaintiff’s pending motion re depositions, ECF No. 159. Plaintiff will withdraw that motion if and when the Court approves this stipulation and order. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: May 14, 2018 NAGELEY, KIRBY & WINBERRY, LLP 11 12 By: /s/ James R. Kirby II James R. Kirby II Attorney for Plaintiff DOROTHY JACKSON 13 14 15 16 Dated: May 14, 2018 ELLIS LAW GROUP LLP 17 18 19 20 By /s/ Theresa M. LaVoie Theresa M. LaVoie Attorney for Defendants RICHARD CALONE; CALONE & HARREL LAW GROUP, LLP; CALONE & BEATTIE, LLP; and CALONE LAW GROUP, LLP 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION AND ORDER RESOLVING MOTION RE DEPOSITIONS (ECF NO. 159) AND SHORTENING TIME FOR DEPOSITION-RELATED MOTIONS 1 IT IS SO ORDERED with the following amendment: 2 Due to the undersigned’s unavailability on May 31, 2018, any discovery dispute arising from 3 the re-scheduled depositions, including the need for additional deposition sessions, will be specially 4 set for hearing on Monday, June 4, 2018, at 2:00 p.m., with all papers filed by May 31, 2018, at 5:00 5 p.m. 6 Dated: May 16, 2018 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION AND ORDER RESOLVING MOTION RE DEPOSITIONS (ECF NO. 159) AND SHORTENING TIME FOR DEPOSITION-RELATED MOTIONS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?