Jackson v. Calone, et al.
Filing
162
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/16/2018 RESOLVING 159 Motion re Depositions. Due to the undersigned's unavailability on 5/31/2018, any discovery dispute arising from the re-scheduled depositions, including the need for additional deposition sessions, will be specially set for hearing on Monday, 6/4/2018, at 2:00 p.m., with all papers filed by 5/31/2018, at 5:00 p.m. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Mark E. Ellis - 127159
Theresa M. LaVoie - 143773
ELLIS LAW GROUP LLP
1425 River Park Drive, Suite 400
Sacramento, CA 95815
Tel: (916) 283-8820
Fax: (916) 283-8821
mellis@ellislawgrp.com
tlavoie@ellislawgrp.com
Attorneys for Defendants RICHARD CALONE; CALONE & HARREL LAW GROUP, LLP;
CALONE & BEATTIE, LLP; CALONE LAW GROUP, LLP
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
DOROTHY RODDEN JACKSON,
14
Plaintiff,
15
v.
16
Case No.: 2:16-cv-00891 TLN KJN
STIPULATION AND ORDER RESOLVING
MOTION RE DEPOSITIONS (ECF NO. 159)
AND SHORTENING TIME FOR
DEPOSITION-RELATED MOTIONS
RICHARD CALONE; CALONE & HARREL
LAW GROUP, LLP; CALONE & BEATTIE,
LLP; CALONE LAW GROUP, LLP,
17
18
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND ORDER RESOLVING MOTION RE DEPOSITIONS (ECF NO. 159) AND SHORTENING TIME
FOR DEPOSITION-RELATED MOTIONS
1
Plaintiff has agreed to reschedule Defendants’ depositions to accommodate their schedules to
2
May 22, 2018 (Mr. Calone) and May 29, 2018 (Mr. Harrel). To avoid potential prejudice to Plaintiff,
3
the parties stipulate that any discovery dispute arising from the re-scheduled depositions, including
4
the need for additional deposition sessions, will be set for hearing on May 31, 2018, at 10:00 a.m.,
5
with all papers filed twenty-four hours before the hearing. Defendants further agree to be available
6
for further depositions, if necessary, before the discovery cut-off date of June 8, 2018.
7
8
9
10
This stipulation and order will resolve Plaintiff’s pending motion re depositions, ECF No. 159.
Plaintiff will withdraw that motion if and when the Court approves this stipulation and order.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: May 14, 2018
NAGELEY, KIRBY & WINBERRY, LLP
11
12
By:
/s/ James R. Kirby II
James R. Kirby II
Attorney for Plaintiff
DOROTHY JACKSON
13
14
15
16
Dated: May 14, 2018
ELLIS LAW GROUP LLP
17
18
19
20
By /s/ Theresa M. LaVoie
Theresa M. LaVoie
Attorney for Defendants
RICHARD CALONE; CALONE & HARREL LAW
GROUP, LLP; CALONE & BEATTIE, LLP; and
CALONE LAW GROUP, LLP
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND ORDER RESOLVING MOTION RE DEPOSITIONS (ECF NO. 159) AND SHORTENING TIME
FOR DEPOSITION-RELATED MOTIONS
1
IT IS SO ORDERED with the following amendment:
2
Due to the undersigned’s unavailability on May 31, 2018, any discovery dispute arising from
3
the re-scheduled depositions, including the need for additional deposition sessions, will be specially
4
set for hearing on Monday, June 4, 2018, at 2:00 p.m., with all papers filed by May 31, 2018, at 5:00
5
p.m.
6
Dated: May 16, 2018
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND ORDER RESOLVING MOTION RE DEPOSITIONS (ECF NO. 159) AND SHORTENING TIME
FOR DEPOSITION-RELATED MOTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?