Jackson v. Calone, et al.

Filing 53

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/28/2016 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 19 , 44 motion to compel compliance with the third party subpoena she served on Schmidt is GRANTED. Schmidt shall produce documents responsive to the requests set forth in plaintiff's subpoena within a reasonable timeframe agreed upon by counsel for plaintiff and Schmidt. Plaintiff's 51 request to withdraw her motion to compel against V.A. Rodden, Inc. is GRANTED. This order resolves the motions filed at ECF Nos. 19 , 30 , 44 , 45 , and 51 . (Zignago, K.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DOROTHY RODDEN JACKSON,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:16-cv-0891-TLN-KJN

ORDER

v.
RICHARD CALONE, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

On October 27, 2016, this case was before the undersigned to address plaintiff Dorothy

18

Rodden Jackson’s (“plaintiff”) motion to compel compliance with the third party subpoena she

19

served on non-party Schmidt, Bettencourt & Medeiros (“Schmidt”). (ECF Nos. 19, 44.) Also

20

before the undersigned was plaintiff’s request to withdraw her motion to compel compliance with

21

the third party subpoena she served on non-party V.A. Rodden, Inc. (ECF Nos. 30, 45, 51.)

22

Attorney James Kirby appeared on behalf of plaintiff. Attorney Quinten Cedar appeared

23

telephonically on behalf of Schmidt.

24

Based on plaintiff’s motions and joint statements regarding these discovery disputes, other

25

relevant filings, and oral arguments, and for the reasons discussed below and on the record during

26

the hearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

27

////

28

////
1

1

1. Plaintiff’s motion to compel compliance with the third party subpoena she served on

2

Schmidt (ECF Nos. 19, 44) is GRANTED.

3

responsive to the requests set forth in plaintiff’s subpoena within a reasonable

4

timeframe agreed upon by counsel for plaintiff and Schmidt.

5
6

Schmidt shall produce documents

2. Plaintiff’s request to withdraw her motion to compel against V.A. Rodden, Inc. (ECF
No. 51) is GRANTED.

7

3. This order resolves the motions filed at ECF Nos. 19, 30, 44, 45, and 51.

8

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9

Dated: October 28, 2016

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2