Jackson v. Calone, et al.

Filing 98

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/3/2017 ORDERING that defendants' 92 , 93 motions for protective order are STAYED and the hearing set for 10/5/2017 is VACATED. After the resolution of defendants' 11 motion to dismiss, the court will reschedule the hearing on its own motion, if necessary. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DOROTHY RODDEN JACKSON, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:16-cv-00891-TLN-KJN v. ORDER RICHARD CALONE, et al., 15 Defendant. 16 17 Presently pending before the court are defendants’ motions for protective order. (ECF 18 Nos. 92, 93.) On June 15, 2016, defendants brought a motion to dismiss (ECF No. 11), which 19 stands submitted before District Judge Troy L. Nunley (ECF No. 16). As such, the court 20 temporarily stays the pending discovery motions, until the motion to dismiss is resolved. 21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 22 1. Defendants’ motions for protective order (ECF Nos. 92, 93) are STAYED and the hearing set for October 5, 2017, is VACATED. 23 2. 24 After the resolution of defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 11), the court will 25 reschedule the hearing on its own motion, if necessary. At which time, parties shall 26 submit an updated joint statement, pursuant to Local Rule 251(c). 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 3, 2017 3 4 14/16-891.jackson.stay 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?