Garcia v. Davey

Filing 7

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 10/13/2017 DISMISSING this action for petitioner's failure to file a proper and complete petition for writ of habeas corpus, as well as for failure to prosecute and comply with the court rules and orders. The Clerk shall enter judgment and close this case. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROBERT ANTHONY GARCIA, 12 No. 2:16-cv-0904-CMK-P Petitioner, 13 vs. 14 DAVE DAVEY, 15 ORDER Respondent. 16 / 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of 18 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has consented to Magistrate Judge 19 jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and no other party has been served or appeared in the 20 action. 21 On March 31, 2017, the court directed Petitioner to show cause in writing, within 22 30 days, why this case should not be closed as an improperly filed attempt at a petition for a writ 23 of habeas corpus. Petitioner was warned that failure to respond to the order may result in 24 dismissal of the case for the reasons outlined as well as for failure to prosecute and comply with 25 court rules and orders. See Local Rule 110. To date, Petitioner has not responded. 26 /// 1 1 The court, therefore, finds it appropriate to dismiss this action for Petitioner’s 2 failure to file a proper and complete petition for writ of habeas corpus, as well as for failure to 3 prosecute and comply with court rules and orders. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter 4 judgment of dismissal and close this case. 5 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: October 13, 2017 ______________________________________ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?