Gomez v. Board of Parole Hearings, et al
Filing
18
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/13/2016 DISMISSING this action without prejudice for failure to state a claim. CASE CLOSED. (Michel, G.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
GUSTAVO GOMEZ,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:16-cv-0911 CKD P
v.
ORDER
BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, seeks relief pursuant to
18
42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 1, 2016, plaintiff’s original complaint was dismissed with thirty
19
days’ leave to amend. (ECF No. 15.) Plaintiff’s amended complaint is now before the court for
20
screening. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). (ECF No. 17.) Plaintiff has consented to Magistrate Judge
21
jurisdiction over all proceedings this action. (ECF No. 13.)
Having reviewed the amended complaint, the undersigned concludes that it fails to cure
22
23
the defects of the original complaint as discussed in the September 1, 2016 screening order.
24
Because it appears that another round of amendment would be futile, the undersigned will dismiss
25
this action for failure to state a claim.
26
////
27
////
28
////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice
2
for failure to state a claim.
3
Dated: October 13, 2016
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
2 / gome0911.fac
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?