Vasquez v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
22
STIPULATION and ORDER granting 21 Motion for Extension of time signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 5/25/17. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
DEBORAH LEE STACHEL
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
CAROLYN B. CHEN, CSBN 256628
Special Assistant United States Attorney
160 Spear Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 977-8956
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
E-Mail: Carolyn.Chen@ssa.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
12
13
FRANCISCO ROBERTO VASQUEZ,
14
Plaintiff,
15
16
vs.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
17
Defendant.
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 2:16-cv-00941-CMK
MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME
OF 21 DAYS FOR DEFENDANT’S
RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
19
Defendant, through her counsel of record, moves for an extension of time of an additional
20
21
21 days to respond to Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. This is the second continuance
22
sought by Defendant. The current due date is May 26, 2017. The new due date will be June 16,
23
2017.
24
There is good cause for this request. Since the filing of Plaintiff’s motion for summary
25
judgment, in the last few days, Defendant’s counsel has come down with flu-like symptoms
26
which will keep her from filing Defendant’s response to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary
27
Judgment timely. Furthermore, in the next few weeks, Defendant’s counsel has pre-approved
28
leave and a continuing full workload of about seven pending District Court briefs and one district
1
1
court hearing to address. Therefore, Defendant is respectfully requesting additional time up to
2
and including June 16, 2017, to fully review the record and research the issues presented by
3
Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, as Defendant’s counsel recovers from her sickness and
4
addresses her workload. This request is made in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the
5
proceedings.
6
Defendant moves that the Court’s Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly.
7
On May 23, 2017, Defendant reached out to Plaintiff through his counsel Steven Rosales
8
of Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing, and Plaintiff through his counsel confirmed on May
9
24, 2017 that he had no objection to the motion.
10
11
12
Respectfully submitted,
Date: May 24, 2017
13
14
PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
By s/ Carolyn B. Chen
CAROLYN B. CHEN
Special Assistant U. S. Attorney
15
16
Attorneys for Defendant
17
18
ORDER
19
20
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED:
21
22
Dated: May 25, 2017
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?