Hoffmann v. Lassen County et al.

Filing 24

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 3/16/17 ORDERING that Plaintiff shall file his response to the motion to dismiss no later than 21 days from the date of this order; Defendants shall file their reply, if any, no later than seven (7) days from the filing of plaintiff's response. At the completion of briefing, the matter will be deemed submitted, without the need for oral argument, pursuant to Local Rule 230(l).(Becknal, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

KASEY F. HOFFMANN,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:16-cv-0946 JAM AC (PS)

v.

ORDER

LASSEN COUNTY, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The action was accordingly referred to the

18

magistrate judge for pretrial proceedings by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21). It appears

19

that plaintiff is an inmate in a correctional facility, and accordingly, motions will be governed by

20

Local Rule 230(l).1 Defendants have filed a motion to dismiss. ECF No. 23.

21

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

22

1.

23

date of this order.

24

2.

25
26

Plaintiff shall file his response to the motion to dismiss no later than 21 days from the

Defendants shall file their reply, if any, no later than seven (7) days from the filing of
plaintiff’s response.

////

27
28

1

However, plaintiff does not challenge the conditions of his confinement in this lawsuit.
1

1
2
3

3.

At the completion of briefing, the matter will be deemed submitted, without the need
for oral argument, pursuant to Local Rule 230(l).

DATED: March 16, 2017

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2