Hoffmann v. Lassen County et al.

Filing 40

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/7/2017 ORDERING that Plaintiff has 21 days from the date of this order to respond to 39 Motion, and the lack of response will be construed as non-opposition. Defendants will have 7 days from the date a response is filed to file a reply brief. (Hunt, G)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

KASEY F. HOFFMAN,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:16-cv-00946-JAM-AC

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

LASSEN COUNTY, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this case, and the matter was accordingly referred to the

18

undersigned for pretrial matters pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On October 26, 2017,

19

defendants submitted a motion for attorneys’ fees. ECF No. 39. Plaintiff has not responded.

20

Plaintiff has twenty-one (21) days from the date of this order to respond to defendants’ motion,

21

and the lack of response will be construed as non-opposition. If plaintiff files a response,

22

defendants will have seven (7) days from the date a response is filed to file a reply brief. When

23

the deadline to file a response or reply has passed, the matter will be taken under submission.

24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: December 7, 2017