Gifford v. Puckett, et al
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/1/17 ORDERING that the court summarily overrules plaintiff's 66 objections. The court warns plaintiff that future unauthorized filings may result in sanctions including dismissal. (Kastilahn, A)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ROBERT PUCKETT, SR., ET AL.,
On May 19, 2017, this court denied plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the
magistrate judge’s order of April 7, 2017 which, inter alia, struck the Second Amended
Complaint as being in violation of the previously assigned magistrate judge’s order that any
Second Amended Complaint not exceed 25 pages. See ECF No. 64. On May 25, without leave
of court or any basis in an applicable rule of law, plaintiff filed objections to the court’s denial
order. ECF No. 66. Because plaintiff’s filing is not supported by rule or law, the court
summarily overrules plaintiff’s objections. The court warns plaintiff that future unauthorized
filings may result in sanctions including dismissal.
This Order resolves ECF No. 64.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: June 1, 2017
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?