Gifford v. Puckett, et al

Filing 67

ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/1/17 ORDERING that the court summarily overrules plaintiff's 66 objections. The court warns plaintiff that future unauthorized filings may result in sanctions including dismissal. (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12

ROGER GIFFORD,

13
14
15
16

No. 2:16-cv-00955-KJM-GGH

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

ROBERT PUCKETT, SR., ET AL.,
Defendants.

17
18

On May 19, 2017, this court denied plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the

19

magistrate judge’s order of April 7, 2017 which, inter alia, struck the Second Amended

20

Complaint as being in violation of the previously assigned magistrate judge’s order that any

21

Second Amended Complaint not exceed 25 pages. See ECF No. 64. On May 25, without leave

22

of court or any basis in an applicable rule of law, plaintiff filed objections to the court’s denial

23

order. ECF No. 66. Because plaintiff’s filing is not supported by rule or law, the court

24

summarily overrules plaintiff’s objections. The court warns plaintiff that future unauthorized

25

filings may result in sanctions including dismissal.

26

This Order resolves ECF No. 64.

27

IT IS SO ORDERED.

28

DATED: June 1, 2017
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE