Turner v. Riaz et al

Filing 25

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/6/2017 GRANTING 24 Request for Extension of Time. Defendants are relieved of their obligation to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint until further order of the Court following disposition of Defendants' motion to revoke Plaintiff's IFP status. Plaintiff to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to Defendants' pending motion within 21 days after Plaintiff is served with the motion. (Henshaw, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

LAFONZO TURNER,

13
14
15

Case No. 2:16-cv-00969 AC P
Plaintiff,

v.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

N. RIAZ, et al.,

16

Defendants.

17
18

Good cause appearing, Defendants’ First Request for an Extension of Time, ECF No. 24, is

19

GRANTED. Defendants are relieved of their obligation to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint until

20

further order of the Court following disposition of Defendants’ motion to revoke Plaintiff’s in

21

forma pauperis status.

22

Plaintiff is directed to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to Defendants’

23

pending motion within 21 days after Plaintiff is served with the motion. See Local Rule 230(l).

24

Defendants may file a reply within 7 days after the filing of Plaintiff’s response. Id.

25
26

SO ORDERED.
DATED: July 6, 2017

27
28
1
[Proposed] Order (2:16-cv-00969-AC)