Mitchell v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 19

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/26/2017 ORDERING that plaintiff may have an extension of time, to and including 2/24/2017, in which to file Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment or Remand; Defendant may have an extension of time to 3/27/2017 to file her opposition. Any reply by plaintiff will be due 4/17/2017. (Zignago, K.)

1
2
3
4

Steven G. Rosales
Attorney at Law: 222224
Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing
12631 East Imperial Highway, Suite C-115
Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670
Tel.: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail [e-mail]

5
Attorneys for Plaintiff CHARLES V. MITCHELL
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
10
11
CHARLES V. MITCHELL,
12
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting
15
Commissioner of Social Security,
16
Defendant
17

) Case No.: 2:16-CV-00970 EFB
)
) STIPULATION TO EXTEND
) BRIEFING SCHEDULE
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

TO THE HONORABLE EDMUND F. BRENNAN, MAGISTRATE
JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT:
Plaintiff Charles V. Mitchell (“Plaintiff”) and defendant Nancy A. Berryhill,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant”), through their undersigned
counsel of record, hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court, to extend
the time for Plaintiff to file Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment or Remand
to February 24, 2017; and that Defendant shall have until March 27, 2017, to file
her opposition. Any reply by plaintiff will be due April 17, 2017.

-1-

1

A final extension of time for plaintiff is needed. As the Court is aware,

2

Plaintiff’s Spouse recently passed away. Due to the press of the holidays and the

3

need to find a caregiver and the required time to acclimate his children to his

4

absence to meet his professional obligations, Counsel requires the additional time

5

for Plaintiff to file Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment or Remand.

6
7

Counsel sincerely apologizes to the court for any inconvenience this may
have had upon it or its staff.

8
DATE: January 25, 2017

Respectfully submitted,

9
LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE D. ROHLFING
10

/s/ Steven G. Rosales
BY: _________________________
Steven G. Rosales
Attorney for plaintiff

11
12
13
DATED: January 25, 2017
14

BENJAMIN WAGNER
United States Attorney

15
16
17
18
19
20

*/S/- Michael K. Marriott
_________________________________
Michael K. Marriott
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Attorney for Defendant
[*Via email authorization]

21
22
23
24
25
26
-2-

1

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff may have an extension of time, to

2

and including February 24, 2017, in which to file Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary

3

Judgment or Remand; Defendant may have an extension of time to March 27, 2017

4

to file her opposition, if any is forthcoming. Any reply by plaintiff will be due

5

April 17, 2017.

6

IT IS SO ORDERED.

7

DATED: January 26, 2017.

8
9

_______________________________________
THE HONORABLE EDMUND F. BRENNAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
-3-