Mitchell v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 24

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 05/02/17 ORDERING that, pursuant to 23 Stipulation to Voluntary Remand Pursuant to Sentence Four, this action is REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the terms of the Stipulation to Remand. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in plaintiff's favor. CASE CLOSED (Benson, A)

Download PDF
1 8 PHILIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney DEBORAH LEE STACHEL Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration MICHAEL K. MARRIOTT, CSBN 280890 Special Assistant United States Attorney 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8985 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 E-mail: Michael.Marriott@ssa.gov 9 Attorneys for Defendant 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 CHARLES V. MITCHELL, Plaintiff, vs. 16 17 18 NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 19 ) Case No. 2:16-cv-00970-EFB ) ) ) [PROPOSED] ) ORDER OF REMAND ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 20 21 22 Based upon the parties’ Stipulation to Voluntary Remand Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment (“Stipulation to Remand”), and for cause shown, IT 23 IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action be remanded to the Commissioner of Social 24 25 Security for further proceedings consistent with the terms of the Stipulation to Remand. The 26 Clerk is directed to enter judgment in plaintiff’s favor. 27 DATED: May 2, 2017. 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?