Lawson v. California Service Company et al

Filing 16

ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 4/18/17 ORDERING that the deadline to complete discovery in this matter is CONTINUED to 11/11/17. The new deadline to complete discovery shall be used as the date by which to calculate all deadlines set in the initial order by reference to the discovery cutoff date (e.g. deadline for disclosure of experts, deadline to file dispositive motions, deadline to file Notice of Trial Readiness).(Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KASHONDA LAWSON, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) vs. CALIFORNIA SERVICE COMPANY, PAUL VITELLI, SHERRI GEBHART, SUSIE HUDSON, and DOES 1 THROUGH 50, 16 Defendants. Case No. 2:16-CV-00990-MCE-EFB ORDER ON STIPULATION TO REQUEST CONTINUATION OF DISCOVERY DEADLINE 17 18 The Court, having read and considered the stipulated request of the parties in this matter to 19 continue the discovery deadline and related deadlines in this case, and finding good cause 20 therefore, GRANTS the requested relief as stated below: 21 1. The deadline to complete discovery in this matter is continued for six months, 22 making the new deadline 11/11/17; 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 STIPULATION TO REQUEST CONTINUANCE Case No. 2:16-CV-00990-MCE-EFB 1 2. The new deadline to complete discovery shall be used as the date by which to 2 calculate all deadlines set in the initial order by reference to the discovery cutoff 3 date (e.g. deadline for disclosure of experts, deadline to file dispositive motions, 4 deadline to file Notice of Trial Readiness). 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 18, 2017 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION TO REQUEST CONTINUANCE Case No. 2:16-CV-00990-MCE-EFB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?