Cascino et al v. County of Shasta et al
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 3/30/17 ORDERING that Plaintiff's Request to seal the original complaint 5 is authorized nunc pro tunc to the date of the request. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
REYNA CASCINO, et al.,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:16-cv-1010-KJM-CMK
Plaintiffs,
vs.
ORDER
COUNTY OF SHASTA, et al.,
Defendants.
16
/
17
Plaintiffs, proceeding pro se, bring this civil action. Pending before the court is
18
plaintiffs’ complaint (Doc. 1), motion to seal (Doc. 5), and a redacted first amended complaint
19
(Doc. 6). Plaintiffs have requested the court seal the original complaint as it contains the full
20
name of minor children. The court notes that the plaintiffs have filed a redacted first amended
21
complaint which utilizes the children’s initials rather than full names, and that the original
22
complaint was sealed as of the time the request was made. The sealing of the original complaint
23
is authorized by the court nunc pro tunc as to the time the plaintiffs filed the request, which has
24
already occurred.
25
As plaintiffs have now filed an amended complaint, pursuant to Federal Rule of
26
Civil Procedure 15(a), this action will proceed on the redacted amended complaint. Plaintiffs’
1
1
amended complaint, and service thereof by the United States Marshal if appropriate, will be
2
addressed separately. The Clerk of the Court shall not issue summons or set this matter for an
3
initial scheduling conference unless specifically directed by the court to do so.
4
5
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs’ request to seal the
original complaint (Doc. 5) is authorized nunc pro tunc to the date of the request.
6
7
DATED: March 30, 2017
8
9
______________________________________
CRAIG M. KELLISON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?