Cascino et al v. County of Shasta et al

Filing 8

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 08/06/18 GRANTING 2 3 Motions to Proceed IFP; Plaintiffs' complaint, and service thereof by the United States Marshal if appropriate, will be addressed separately. (Benson, A.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

REYNA CASCINO, et al.,

12

Plaintiffs,

13
14

No. 2:16-CV-1010-KJM-CMK

vs.

ORDER

COUNTY OF SHASTA, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16

/

17

Plaintiffs, who are proceeding pro se, bring this civil action. Pending before the

18

court are plaintiffs’ requests for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Docs. 2 and 3). Plaintiffs’

19

complaint, and service thereof by the United States Marshal if appropriate, will be addressed

20

separately. The Clerk of the Court shall not issue summons or set this matter for an initial

21

scheduling conference unless specifically directed by the court to do so.

22

Plaintiffs have submitted the affidavit required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) showing

23

that plaintiff is unable to prepay fees and costs or give security therefor.

24

///

25

///

26

///
1

1
2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs’ motions for leave to
proceed in forma pauperis (Docs. 2 and3) are granted.

3
4
5
6

DATED: August 6, 2018
______________________________________
CRAIG M. KELLISON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2