Frances v. Accessible Space, Inc. et al
Filing
50
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/24/18 DENYING Plaintiff's Motion for a Restraining Order; The Clerk of the Court shall remove the gavel on ECF No. 39 on the court's docket. (Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ANGELICA FRANCES,
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
No. 2:16-cv-01016-JAM-GGH
ORDER
v.
ACCESSIBLE SPACE, INC., et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
Plaintiff appears in this personal injury action pro se and in forma pauperis. On May 29,
19
2018 the magistrate judge to whom the matter was assigned issued Findings and
20
Recommendations recommending that plaintiff’s Motion for a Restraining Order should be
21
denied as moot. ECF No. 39. Parties were given fourteen (14) days to file any objections to the
22
foregoing. Id. Plaintiff filed what was denominated as a Response to defendants’ Opposition to
23
her Motion, ECF No. 42, which the court views as objections to the Findings and
24
Recommendations.
25
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304,
26
this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file and the
27
magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations the court ADOPTS the findings and
28
recommendations in full.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
Plaintiff’s Motion for a Restraining Order is DENIED;
3
2.
The Clerk of the Court shall remove the gavel on ECF No. 39 on the court’s docket.
4
5
6
7
October 24, 2018
John A. Mendez_________________
United States District Court Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?