Frances v. Accessible Space, Inc. et al

Filing 50

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/24/18 DENYING Plaintiff's Motion for a Restraining Order; The Clerk of the Court shall remove the gavel on ECF No. 39 on the court's docket. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANGELICA FRANCES, 12 13 14 Plaintiff, No. 2:16-cv-01016-JAM-GGH ORDER v. ACCESSIBLE SPACE, INC., et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff appears in this personal injury action pro se and in forma pauperis. On May 29, 19 2018 the magistrate judge to whom the matter was assigned issued Findings and 20 Recommendations recommending that plaintiff’s Motion for a Restraining Order should be 21 denied as moot. ECF No. 39. Parties were given fourteen (14) days to file any objections to the 22 foregoing. Id. Plaintiff filed what was denominated as a Response to defendants’ Opposition to 23 her Motion, ECF No. 42, which the court views as objections to the Findings and 24 Recommendations. 25 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, 26 this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file and the 27 magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations the court ADOPTS the findings and 28 recommendations in full. 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. Plaintiff’s Motion for a Restraining Order is DENIED; 3 2. The Clerk of the Court shall remove the gavel on ECF No. 39 on the court’s docket. 4 5 6 7 October 24, 2018                John A. Mendez_________________                United States District Court Judge  8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?