Winegarner v. Rite Aid Corporation
Filing
40
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 3/12/2018 ORDERING that this action be and hereby is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each sideto bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. (Washington, S)
1
2
3
4
MATTHEW RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 121012)
JOHN GLUGOSKI (Cal. State Bar No. 191551)
MICHAEL RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 258541)
RIGHETTI·GLUGOSKI, P.C.
456 Montgomery Street, Suite 1400
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: (415) 983-0900
Facsimile: (415) 397-9005
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Caren Winegarner
JEFFREY D. WOHL (Cal. State Bar No. 96838)
JULLIE Z. LAL (Cal. State Bar No. 279067)
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
101 California Street, 48th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone:
(415) 856-7000
Facsimile:
(415) 856-7100
jeffwohl@paulhastings.com
jullielal@paullhastings.com
Attorneys for Defendant
Rite Aid Corporation
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
CAREN WINEGARNER, an individual,
18
Plaintiff,
No. 2:16-CV-01028-JAM-EFB
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF
ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
19
vs.
Judge:
Dept.:
20
21
RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1
through 50, inclusive,
Hon. John A. Mendez
6, 14th Floor
Complaint Filed:
Trial Date:
February 2, 2016
None Set
22
Defendants.
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION
U.S.D.C. E.D. CAL. NO. 2:16-CV-01028-JAM-EFB
LEGAL_US_W # 93186587.1
1
Plaintiff Caren Winegarner and defendant Rite Aid Corporation, acting through their respective
2
counsel of record, hereby stipulate that this action may be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to
3
Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, each side to bear its own costs and attorneys’
4
fees.
5
6
Dated: March 12, 2018.
7
MATTHEW RIGHETTI
JOHN GLUGOSKI
MICHAEL RIGHETTI
RIGHETTI·GLUGOSKI, P.C.
8
By: /s/ Michael Righetti
Michael Righetti
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Caren Winegarner
9
10
11
12
Dated: March 12, 2018.
13
14
JEFFREY D. WOHL
JULLIE Z. LAL
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
By: /s/ Jullie Z. Lal
Jullie Z. Lal
Attorneys for Defendant
Rite Aid Corporation
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION
U.S.D.C. E.D. CAL. NO. 2:16-CV-01028-JAM-EFB
LEGAL_US_W # 93186587.1
1
2
3
4
MATTHEW RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 121012)
JOHN GLUGOSKI (Cal. State Bar No. 191551)
MICHAEL RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 258541)
RIGHETTI·GLUGOSKI, P.C.
456 Montgomery Street, Suite 1400
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: (415) 983-0900
Facsimile: (415) 397-9005
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Caren Winegarner
JEFFREY D. WOHL (Cal. State Bar No. 96838)
JULLIE Z. LAL (Cal. State Bar No. 279067)
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
101 California Street, 48th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone:
(415) 856-7000
Facsimile:
(415) 856-7100
jeffwohl@paulhastings.com
tuckerpage@paulhastings.com
Attorneys for Defendant
Rite Aid Corporation
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
CAREN WINEGARNER, an individual,
18
Plaintiff,
No. 2:16-CV-01028-JAM-EFB
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH
PREJUDICE
19
vs.
Judge:
Dept.:
20
21
RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1
through 50, inclusive,
Hon. John A. Mendez
6, 14th Floor
Complaint Filed:
Trial Date:
February 2, 2016
None Set
22
Defendants.
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION
U.S.D.C. E.D. CAL. NO. 2:16-CV-01028-JAM-EFB
LEGAL_US_W # 93186588.1
1
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor,
2
IT IS ORDERED that this action be and hereby is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each side
3
4
to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.
Dated: 3/12/2018
5
/s/ John A. Mendez____________
John A. Mendez
United States District Court Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION
U.S.D.C. E.D. CAL. NO. 2:16-CV-01028-JAM-EFB
LEGAL_US_W # 93186588.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?