Winegarner v. Rite Aid Corporation

Filing 40

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 3/12/2018 ORDERING that this action be and hereby is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each sideto bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. (Washington, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 MATTHEW RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 121012) JOHN GLUGOSKI (Cal. State Bar No. 191551) MICHAEL RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 258541) RIGHETTI·GLUGOSKI, P.C. 456 Montgomery Street, Suite 1400 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 983-0900 Facsimile: (415) 397-9005 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Attorneys for Plaintiff Caren Winegarner JEFFREY D. WOHL (Cal. State Bar No. 96838) JULLIE Z. LAL (Cal. State Bar No. 279067) PAUL HASTINGS LLP 101 California Street, 48th Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 856-7000 Facsimile: (415) 856-7100 jeffwohl@paulhastings.com jullielal@paullhastings.com Attorneys for Defendant Rite Aid Corporation 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 CAREN WINEGARNER, an individual, 18 Plaintiff, No. 2:16-CV-01028-JAM-EFB STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 19 vs. Judge: Dept.: 20 21 RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Hon. John A. Mendez 6, 14th Floor Complaint Filed: Trial Date: February 2, 2016 None Set 22 Defendants. 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION U.S.D.C. E.D. CAL. NO. 2:16-CV-01028-JAM-EFB LEGAL_US_W # 93186587.1 1 Plaintiff Caren Winegarner and defendant Rite Aid Corporation, acting through their respective 2 counsel of record, hereby stipulate that this action may be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 3 Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, each side to bear its own costs and attorneys’ 4 fees. 5 6 Dated: March 12, 2018. 7 MATTHEW RIGHETTI JOHN GLUGOSKI MICHAEL RIGHETTI RIGHETTI·GLUGOSKI, P.C. 8 By: /s/ Michael Righetti Michael Righetti Attorneys for Plaintiff Caren Winegarner 9 10 11 12 Dated: March 12, 2018. 13 14 JEFFREY D. WOHL JULLIE Z. LAL PAUL HASTINGS LLP By: /s/ Jullie Z. Lal Jullie Z. Lal Attorneys for Defendant Rite Aid Corporation 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION U.S.D.C. E.D. CAL. NO. 2:16-CV-01028-JAM-EFB LEGAL_US_W # 93186587.1 1 2 3 4 MATTHEW RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 121012) JOHN GLUGOSKI (Cal. State Bar No. 191551) MICHAEL RIGHETTI (Cal. State Bar No. 258541) RIGHETTI·GLUGOSKI, P.C. 456 Montgomery Street, Suite 1400 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 983-0900 Facsimile: (415) 397-9005 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Attorneys for Plaintiff Caren Winegarner JEFFREY D. WOHL (Cal. State Bar No. 96838) JULLIE Z. LAL (Cal. State Bar No. 279067) PAUL HASTINGS LLP 101 California Street, 48th Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 856-7000 Facsimile: (415) 856-7100 jeffwohl@paulhastings.com tuckerpage@paulhastings.com Attorneys for Defendant Rite Aid Corporation 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 CAREN WINEGARNER, an individual, 18 Plaintiff, No. 2:16-CV-01028-JAM-EFB ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 19 vs. Judge: Dept.: 20 21 RITE AID CORPORATION, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Hon. John A. Mendez 6, 14th Floor Complaint Filed: Trial Date: February 2, 2016 None Set 22 Defendants. 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION U.S.D.C. E.D. CAL. NO. 2:16-CV-01028-JAM-EFB LEGAL_US_W # 93186588.1 1 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor, 2 IT IS ORDERED that this action be and hereby is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each side 3 4 to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. Dated: 3/12/2018 5 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ John A. Mendez United States District Court Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION U.S.D.C. E.D. CAL. NO. 2:16-CV-01028-JAM-EFB LEGAL_US_W # 93186588.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?