Polk v. Placer County et al

Filing 13

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/26/2017 DISMISSING this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED.(Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DARRELL E. POLK, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:16-cv-1034 KJN P v. ORDER PLACER COUNTY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff consented to proceed before the undersigned for all purposes. See 28 U.S.C. 17 18 § 636(c). By order filed January 4, 2017, plaintiff was ordered to show cause, within fourteen 19 days, why this action should not be dismissed. The fourteen day period has now expired, and 20 plaintiff has not shown cause or otherwise responded to the court’s order.1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. 21 22 See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 23 Dated: January 26, 2017 24 polk1034.fsc 25 26 27 28 1 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order, as well as an earlier order, were returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?