Evans v. Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Trust et al.

Filing 24

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/10/2017 ORDERING Defendants to file motion for summary judgment and opposition to plaintiff's motion by 2/23/2017; Plaintiff to file reply brief and opposition by 3/9/2017; Defendant to file reply brief by 3/16/2017; Hearing on cross motions for summary judgment to be held at 2:00 PM on 3/23/2017. (Reader, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Teresa S. Renaker, Cal. Bar No. 187800
Margaret E. Hasselman, Cal. Bar No.
228529
Kirsten G. Scott, Cal Bar. No. 253464
RENAKER HASSELMAN SCOTT LLP
235 Montgomery St., Suite 944
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

8
9

Attorneys for Plaintiff

10
11

BEESON, TAYER & BODINE, APC
520 Capitol Mall, Suite 300
Sacramento, CA 95814-4714
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
CAROL A. KRSTULIC
[Admitted Pro Hac Vice]
BLAKE & UHLIG, P.A.
753 State Avenue, Suite 745
Kansas City, KS 66101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants

JOHN C. PROVOST, SBN 125458

12
13
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

17
18

DARRYL EVANS,
Plaintiff,

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Case No. 16-CV-01043-TLN-KJN

STIPULATION AND ORDER
REGARDING PARTIES’ BRIEFING
SCHEDULE FOR CROSS-MOTIONS FOR
BOILERMAKER-BLACKSMITH NATIONAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
PENSION TRUST AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE BOILERMAKERBLACKSMITH NATIONAL PENSION
TRUST,
v.

Defendants.

26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: PARTIES’ BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR CROSS-MOTIONS FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CASE NO. 16-CV-01043-TLN-KJN

1
2
3

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Darryl Evans filed a motion for summary judgment on February 9,
2017, with a hearing set for March 23, 2017, at 2:00pm;
WHEREAS, Defendants Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Trust and Board of

4

Trustees of the Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Trust intend to file a cross-motion for

5

summary judgment;

6

WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 230(e), a cross-motion that is related to the general

7

subject matter of the original motion shall be served and filed in the manner and on the date

8

prescribed for the filing of the opposition brief;

9

WHEREAS, for efficiency purposes, the Parties desire to brief the cross-motions for

10

summary judgment in four briefs instead of six, and have met and conferred about a briefing

11

schedule;

12
13

THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate to the following briefing schedule for the
Parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment:

14

(1) Plaintiff filed motion for summary judgment on February 9, 2017;

15

(2) Defendants to file combined motion for summary judgment and opposition to

16
17
18

Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment by February 23, 2017;
(3) Plaintiff to file combined reply brief and opposition to Defendants’ motion for
summary judgment by March 9, 2017;

19

(4) Defendant to file reply brief by March 16, 2017;

20

(5) Hearing on the Parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment to be held at 2:00pm on

21

March 23, 2017, or as soon thereafter as counsel may be heard by the Court.

22
23

Dated: February 10, 2017

Respectfully submitted,

24
RENAKER HASSELMAN SCOTT LLP

25
26
27
28

By:

___/ s / Kirsten Scott____________
Kirsten Scott
Attorneys for Plaintiff

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: PARTIES’ BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR CROSS-MOTIONS FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CASE NO. 16-CV-01043-TLN-KJN
PAGE 2

1
2

Dated: February 10, 2017

Respectfully submitted,

3
By:

4
5

__/ s / Carol Krstulic___________
Carol Krstulic
Attorneys for Defendants

6
7
8
9
10
11

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
I, Kirsten Scott, hereby attest that the concurrence in the filing of the document has been
obtained from the other signatory on this document.

12
13

Dated: Feb 10, 2017

14

By:

___/ s / Kirsten Scott____________
Kirsten Scott

15
16
17
18
19
20
21

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 10, 2017
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: PARTIES’ BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR CROSS-MOTIONS FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CASE NO. 16-CV-01043-TLN-KJN
PAGE 3