State Farm Life Insurance Company v. Lowe
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/12/2016 ORDERING that no later than 10/28/2016, Defendant shall file a statement of whether plaintiff's proposed trial date of July 2017 is objectionable. It is further ORDERED that no later than 11/14/2016 defendant shall file an answer or other responsive pleading. Finally, by no later than 10/28/2016, the parties shall file objections, if any, to the transfer of this action to the Eastern District of Missouri. (Donati, J)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
STATE FARM LIFE INSURANCE
No. 2:16-cv-1048 KJM CKD PS
This matter was referred to the undersigned for pretrial management by minute order filed
October 12, 2016. Defendant has requested telephonic appearance at any status conference due to
financial hardship. Defendant indicates that a non-refundable plane ticket was purchased at a cost
of $600 and that money was lost when the schedule was changed due to the reassignment. In the
interest of justice, any scheduling order that issues will be conducted on the papers.
Defendant has not yet filed a responsive pleading. Defendant is advised that an answer or
other responsive pleading must be filed within thirty days or default judgment may be taken
The complaint in this declaratory relief action alleges diversity as the basis of subject
matter jurisdiction. The federal venue statute provides that a civil action may be brought only in
“(1) a judicial district where any defendant resides, if all defendants are residents of the State in
which the district is located; (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or
omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of property that is the subject of
the action is situated; or (3) if there is no district in which an action may otherwise be brought as
provided in this section, any judicial district in which any defendant is subject to the court’s
personal jurisdiction with respect to such action.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). In the interest of justice,
and for the convenience of the parties and witnesses, a federal court may transfer any civil action
to any other district where it might have been brought. See 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). In this case, it
appears that defendant has resided in Cape Girardeau, Missouri, which is located in the Eastern
District of Missouri, since before this action was commenced. Given defendant’s pro se status
and the financial hardships that will be imposed on defendant if this action is prosecuted in
California, it appears that transfer to the District Court in Missouri is appropriate.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. No later than October 28, 2016, defendant shall file a statement of whether plaintiff’s
proposed trial date of July, 2017 is objectionable. If defendant objects to a trial date in July,
2017, defendant shall set forth an alternative trial date.
2. No later than November 14, 2016, defendant shall file an answer or other responsive
3. No later than October 28, 2016, the parties shall file objections, if any, to the transfer
of this action to the United States District Court, Eastern District of Missouri.
Dated: October 12, 2016
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?