Vision Service Plan v. Nouveau Vision, Inc. et al.

Filing 14

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/30/2017 ORDERING The deposition of Defendant Timothy J. Sutich will take place on Thursday, 9/13/2017 commencing at 10:00 a.m. at the offices of Atkinson Baker located at 641 Fulton Avenue, Suit e 200, Sacramento, CA. The deposition of Nouveau Vision, Inc. will then take place immediately after the conclusion of the deposition of Sutich. This Stipulation and Order shall be binding on the parties and treated as if Plaintiff VSP had filed a Motion to Compel the Depositions of Defendants Nouveau and Sutich, and an order has been entered in favor of Plaintiff VSP in accordance with FRCP Rules 26, 30 and 34. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 STERN & GOLDBERG ALAN N. GOLDBERG (SBN 112836) agoldberg@sgattys.com PETER TRAN (SBN 280016) ptran@sgattys.com 3 6345 Balboa Boulevard, Suite 200 4 Encino, California 91316 Telephone: (818) 758-3940 5 Facsimile: (818) 758-3950 2 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff Vision Service Plan, a California 7 corporation 8 BENBROOK LAW GROUP, PC BRADLEY A. BENBROOK (SBN 177786) brad@benbrooklawgroup.com STEPHEN M. DUVERNAY (SBN 250957) steve@benbrooklawgroup.com 10 400 Capitol Mall, Suite 2530 11 Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone: (916) 447-4900 12 Facsimile: (916) 447-4904 9 13 Attorneys for Defendants Nouveau Vision, Inc., a Washington 14 corporation, and Timothy J. Sutich, an individual 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 VISION SERVICE PLAN, a California not-for-profit corporation, 19 20 21 Plaintiff, v. NOUVEAU VISION, INC., a CASE NO.: 2:16-CV-01049-TLN-KJN STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: SCHEDULING DEPOSITIONS OF DEFENDANTS NOUVEAU VISION, INC. AND TIMOTHY J. SUTICH 22 Washington corporation, TIMOTHY J. SUTICH, an individual and DOES 1 23 through 50, inclusive, 24 Defendants. 25 26 27 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between Plaintiff Vision 28 Service Plan (“VSP” herein) and Defendants Nouveau Vision, Inc. (“Nouveau” 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: SCHEDULING DEPOSITIONS OF DEFENDANTS G:\DOCS\KJN\Robbin\signed - kjn\16-1049 VSP v. Nouveau Vision Order re Stip re Scheduling Depos.docx 1 herein) and Timothy J. Sutich (“Sutich” herein) (collectively referred to as 2 “Defendants”), through their duly authorized counsel of record, that the following 3 Stipulation may be entered as an order of the Court with regard to the scheduling 4 of the depositions of Nouveau and Sutich in the above-entitled action. 5 WHEREAS, on June 12, 2017, Plaintiff VSP served Notices of Deposition 6 of Defendants Nouveau and Sutich and Request for Production of Documents 7 Thereat. The Deposition of Mr. Sutich was scheduled for July 13, 2017 at 10:00 8 a.m., and the Deposition of the Person Most Knowledgeable (“PMK” herein) of 9 Nouveau was scheduled to commence after the completion of the deposition of 10 Mr. Sutich. 11 WHEREAS, counsel for Defendants advised that he was unavailable for the 12 scheduled depositions and because of scheduling issues they would need to be 13 continued until mid-August. As a result, it was agreed that the depositions would 14 be continued to a mutually convenient date. 15 WHEREAS, on July 27, 2017, it was agreed that the depositions of 16 Defendants Sutich and Nouveau would take place on August 22, 2017. Counsel 17 for Defendants also advised that Mr. Sutich would be the sole PMK for Defendant 18 Nouveau. On August 2, 2017, Notices of Deposition of Sutich and Nouveau were 19 served scheduling the depositions for August 22, 2017, in Sacramento, California. 20 In addition, a Notice of Deposition of an uncooperative third party witness was 21 scheduled for August 23, 2017, in San Jose, California. 22 WHEREAS, on August 17, 2017, counsel for Defendants advised that due 23 to a mistake on their side, Mr. Sutich would not be able to appear on August 22, 24 2017. Counsel for Plaintiff then proposed a number of alternative dates. 25 Defendants have stated they are available to appear for deposition on September 26 13, 2017. 27 WHEREAS, Plaintiff does not desire to have this situation arise again on 28 September 13, 2017, where Defendants assert they are then unavailable. 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: SCHEDULING DEPOSITIONS OF DEFENDANTS G:\DOCS\KJN\Robbin\signed - kjn\16-1049 VSP v. Nouveau Vision Order re Stip re Scheduling Depos.docx 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 2 1. The deposition of Defendant Sutich will take place on Thursday, 3 September 13, 2017 commencing at 10:00 a.m. at the offices of Atkinson Baker 4 located at 641 Fulton Avenue, Suite 200, Sacramento, California 95825. The 5 deposition of Nouveau will then take place immediately after the conclusion of the 6 deposition of Sutich. 7 2. This Stipulation and Order shall be binding on the parties and treated 8 as if Plaintiff VSP had filed a Motion to Compel the Depositions of Defendants 9 Nouveau and Sutich, and an order has been entered in favor of Plaintiff VSP in 10 accordance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rules 26, 30 and 34. 11 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 12 Respectfully submitted, 13 Dated: August 23, 2017 STERN & GOLDBERG 14 15 By: 16 17 18 /s/ Alan N. Goldberg ALAN N. GOLDBERG PETER TRAN Attorneys for Plaintiff Vision Service Plan, a California not-forprofit corporation 19 20 21 Dated: August 23, 2017 BENBROOK LAW GROUP, PC 22 23 By: 24 25 26 /s/ Stephen M. Duvernay BRADLEY A. BENBROOK STEPHEN M. DUVERNAY Attorneys for Defendants Nouveau Vision, Inc., a Washington corporation, and Timothy J. Sutich, an individual 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: SCHEDULING DEPOSITIONS OF DEFENDANTS G:\DOCS\KJN\Robbin\signed - kjn\16-1049 VSP v. Nouveau Vision Order re Stip re Scheduling Depos.docx ORDER 1 2 The Court accepts this Stipulation of the parties, and enters the above 3 Stipulation as being the ruling of the Court as if Plaintiff VSP had filed a motion 4 to compel the depositions of Defendants Nouveau and Sutich and the motion had 5 been granted. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 Dated: August 30, 2017 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: SCHEDULING DEPOSITIONS OF DEFENDANTS G:\DOCS\KJN\Robbin\signed - kjn\16-1049 VSP v. Nouveau Vision Order re Stip re Scheduling Depos.docx

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?