American Multi-Cinema, Inc. v. Manteca Lifestyle Center, LLC

Filing 24

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/31/17: Defendant shall produce documents responsive to Request Nos. 30, 31, 32, and 35 no later than April 28, 2017, subject to any stipulated extension by the parties. After review of the responsive documents, the parties shall meet and confer in good faith regarding the need for further discovery, including deposition testimony, related to the other leases and tenants. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 AMERICAN MULTI-CINEMA, INC., 12 13 14 15 No. 2:16-cv-1066 TLN KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER MANTECA LIFESTYLE CENTER, LLC, Defendant. 16 17 Pursuant to the parties’ request, the court conducted an informal telephonic discovery 18 conference on March 30, 2017. Attorney Christopher Rheinheimer appeared on behalf of 19 plaintiff, and attorney Daniel Fleming appeared on behalf of defendant. After carefully 20 considering the parties’ joint letter brief (ECF No. 23) and the parties’ oral arguments at the 21 telephonic conference, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 22 1. Defendant shall produce documents responsive to Request Nos. 30, 31, 32, and 35 no 23 later than April 28, 2017, subject to any stipulated extension by the parties. However, 24 defendant may redact any information that is not pertinent to the community facility 25 district (“CFD”) special assessments and payment provisions, such as the amount of 26 rent per square footage or tenant improvement allotments. 27 28 2. After review of the responsive documents, the parties shall meet and confer in good faith regarding the need for further discovery, including deposition testimony, related 1 1 2 3 to the other leases and tenants. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 31, 2017 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?