American Multi-Cinema, Inc. v. Manteca Lifestyle Center, LLC

Filing 35

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 06/09/17 ORDERING that Defendant's request to compel production of electronically stored information ("ESI") relating to the Kerasotes entity for an increased scope of time beyond J une 2009 to June 2010 is DENIED; Defendant's request to compel plaintiff to conduct additional searches of ESI related to Kerasotes with additional search terms is DENIED; Defendant's request to compel plaintiff to conduct additional research and searches with respect to Kerasotes documents potentially located at the Bollingbrook and Chicago locations identified in the parties' joint letter brief is DENIED. (Benson, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

AMERICAN MULTI-CINEMA, INC.,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:16-cv-1066 TLN KJN

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

MANTECA LIFESTYLE CENTER, LLC,
Defendant.

16
17

Pursuant to the parties’ request, the court conducted an informal telephonic discovery

18

conference on June 8, 2017. Attorney Christopher Rheinheimer appeared on behalf of plaintiff,

19

and attorney Daniel Fleming appeared on behalf of defendant. After considering the parties’ joint

20

letter brief (ECF No. 34), and for the reasons discussed with the parties at the telephonic

21

conference, including the impending June 9, 2017 fact discovery completion deadline, IT IS

22

HEREBY ORDERED that:

23

1. Defendant’s request to compel production of electronically stored information (“ESI”)

24

relating to the Kerasotes entity for an increased scope of time beyond June 2009 to

25

June 2010 is denied.

26
27
28

2. Defendant’s request to compel plaintiff to conduct additional searches of ESI related
to Kerasotes with additional search terms is denied.
3. Defendant’s request to compel plaintiff to conduct additional research and searches
1

1

with respect to Kerasotes documents potentially located at the Bollingbrook and

2

Chicago locations identified in the parties’ joint letter brief is denied.

3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 9, 2017

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2