Abramyan et al. v. Geico Insurance Company
Filing
21
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 4/12/2017 MODIFYING the 3 Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order; ORDERING that Rule 26 initial disclosures occur by 4/21/2017; ORDERING that discovery be completed by 10/10/2017 ; ORDERING that the disclosure of expert witnesses and the deadline for filing any dispositive motions be calculated in accordance with the extended discovery date; ORDERING the parties to file a Joint Notice of Trial Readiness in accordance with the 3 Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order. (Michel, G.)
1 FREEMAN, MATHIS & GARY, LLP
TIMOTHY W. KENNA, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION / Bar No. 64280
2 t.kenna@gilbertkelly.com
GLENN M. KENNA / Bar No. 305092
3 gkenna@gilbertkelly.com
550 South Hope Street, 22nd Floor
4 Los Angeles, California 90071-2627
(213) 615-7000; FAX (213) 615-7100
5
Attorneys for Defendant
6 GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY
7 KEVIN W. HARRIS, S.B.#133084
Attorney at Law
8 1387 Garden Hwy., Ste. 200
Sacramento, CA 95833
9 Telephone: (916) 271-0688
10 RYAN P. FRIEDMAN , S.B.N. 252244
FRIEDMAN LAW FIRM, INC.
11 1383 Garden Hwy., Ste. 200
Sacramento, CA 95833
12 Telephone: (916) 800-4454
Attorneys for Plaintiff
13 ARSEN ABRAMYAN and NARINA
ZAKHARYAN
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
ARSEN ABRAMYAN and NARINA
17 ZAKHARYAN,
18
v.
Plaintiffs,
19
GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY, and
20 Does 1-40, inclusive,
Defendants.
21
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:16-cv-01069-MCE-AC
STIPULATION TO MODIFY
INITIAL PRETRIAL ORDER AND
JOINT RULE 26(F) REPORT
REGARDING DATES OF
DISCOVERY CUT OFF, INITIAL
DISCLOSURES, AND TRIAL
DATE; ORDER THEREON
22
23
It is hereby stipulated by the Parties in the instant action through their
24 attorneys of record as follows:
25
1.
Pursuant to Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the
26
parties held their discovery and planning conference by teleconference on July
27
18, 2016 and submitted a joint report filed on August 1, 2016.
28
/////
Case No. 2:16-CV-01069-MCE-AC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Gilbert, Kelly
Crowley & Jennett LLP
Attorneys at Law
4300627.1 30691-00029 GMK
2.
1
At the time that the Joint Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, Rule
2
26(f) Joint Conference Report was filed, a motion to dismiss filed by Defendant
3
GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY was still pending before the Court.
3.
4
5
At the time that the Joint Conference Report was filed the
parties believed that they would shortly be receiving a ruling from the Court.
4.
6
At the time that the Joint Conference Report was filed the parties
7
had agreed to a trial date in or around August 2, 2017 and to a discovery
8
completion date in or around May 19, 2017.
5.
9
At the time that the Joint Conference Report was filed, the Parties
10
agreed that Initial disclosures under Rule 26(a)(1) would be made on or before 21
11
days after the Court’s ruling on defendant’s 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss then set for
12
August 11, 2016.
6.
13
14
At the time that the Joint Conference Report was filed, the
parties stipulated to the need to take the following discovery:
a.
15
The Parties anticipated taking at least 6 depositions and
16
agreed that if the matter was converted into a class action they would waive the
17
10-deposition limit set out in Rule 30(a)(2)(A)(i). The parties agreed that
18
depositions shall not exceed 3 days or 21 hours. Depositions will be limited to 7
19
hours a day.
b.
20
Interrogatories. Shall be conducted pursuant to Rule 33(a)(1)
21
except that each party shall be limited to fifty (50) interrogatories and responses
22
shall be due 45 days after service
c.
24
Request for admissions. Shall be conducted pursuant to Rule 36.
34.
25
26
Production of documents. Shall be conducted pursuant to Rule
(3)
23
7.
Defendants have just recently filed an answer with the Court on
27
March 20 2017 and filed an amended answer March 31, 217, the case is now at
28
issue as an answer is on file.
-2-
Gilbert, Kelly
Crowley & Jennett LLP
Attorneys at Law
STIPULATION AND ORDER
4300627.1 30691-00029
1
8.
Pursuant to their Rule 26(f) Joint Report the parties were waiting for
2
the court to make its ruling prior to engaging in discovery, so that the issues were
3
clear as to what discovery was warranted. Since the Order on the Motion to
4
Dismiss was not filed until March 10, 2017 and an answer not filed until March
5
20, 2017, good cause exists pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil
6
Procedure to amend the Pretrial Order Dated May 19, 2016, and the Stipulations
7
under Rule 26(f) to change the dates for initial disclosures, discovery cut off, and
8
the proposed trial dates as follows:
9
a.
The Rule 26 initial disclosures shall occur on or before 4/21/17;
10
b.
The Discovery Cut Off will be extended from May 19, 2016
11
until October 10, 2017 (approximately the length of time from the date the
12
original hearing on the motion to dismiss was to be heard on August 11, 2017
13
and the date the decision on the motion to dismiss was entered by the Court on
14
March 10, 2017.)
15
16
c.
The Trial Date be scheduled on or about May 14, 2018.
Dated: March 31, 2017
17
GILBERT, KELLY, CROWLEY & JENNETT
LLP
18
By:
19
/S/ GLENN M. KENNA
TIMOTHY W. KENNA, A
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
GLENN M. KENNA
Attorneys for Defendant
GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY
20
21
22
23 Dated: March 31, 2017
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
24
By:
25
/S/ AS AUTHORIZED ON [DATE]
KEVIN W. HARRIS
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ARSEN ABRAMYAN and
NARINA ZACKARYAN
26
27
28
-3-
Gilbert, Kelly
Crowley & Jennett LLP
Attorneys at Law
STIPULATION AND ORDER
4300627.1 30691-00029
1 Dated: March 31, 2017
FRIEDMAN LAW FIRM, INC.
2
By:
3
/S/ AS AUTHORIZED ON [DATE]
RAYN P. FRIEDMAN
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ARSEN ABRAMYAN and
NARINA ZACKARYAN
4
5
6
ORDER
7
8
Having determined that good cause exists under Federal Rule of Civil
9 Procedure 16(b) to modify the Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order and the dates
10 proposed in the Parties Rule 26 Report, the Court directs as follows:
11
a.
The Rule 26 initial disclosures shall occur on April 21, 2017;
12
b.
The Discovery Cut Off will be extended from May 19, 2016 until
13
October 10, 2017 (approximately the length of time from the date the
14
original hearing on the motion to dismiss was to be heard on August
15
11, 2017 and the date the decision on the motion to dismiss was
16
entered by the Court on March 10, 2017.)
17
c.
In accordance with the Court’s Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order (ECF
18
No. 3), disclosure of expert witnesses and the deadline for filing any
19
dispositive motions shall be calculated in accordance with the extended
20
discovery date. Also in accordance with the Scheduling Order, the
21
parties are directed to file a Joint Notice of Trial Readiness at which
22
time a trial date will be set.
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24 Dated: April 12, 2017
25
26
27
28
-4-
Gilbert, Kelly
Crowley & Jennett LLP
Attorneys at Law
STIPULATION AND ORDER
4300627.1 30691-00029
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?