Abramyan et al. v. Geico Insurance Company

Filing 21

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 4/12/2017 MODIFYING the 3 Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order; ORDERING that Rule 26 initial disclosures occur by 4/21/2017; ORDERING that discovery be completed by 10/10/2017 ; ORDERING that the disclosure of expert witnesses and the deadline for filing any dispositive motions be calculated in accordance with the extended discovery date; ORDERING the parties to file a Joint Notice of Trial Readiness in accordance with the 3 Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order. (Michel, G.)

Download PDF
1 FREEMAN, MATHIS & GARY, LLP TIMOTHY W. KENNA, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION / Bar No. 64280 2 t.kenna@gilbertkelly.com GLENN M. KENNA / Bar No. 305092 3 gkenna@gilbertkelly.com 550 South Hope Street, 22nd Floor 4 Los Angeles, California 90071-2627 (213) 615-7000; FAX (213) 615-7100 5 Attorneys for Defendant 6 GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY 7 KEVIN W. HARRIS, S.B.#133084 Attorney at Law 8 1387 Garden Hwy., Ste. 200 Sacramento, CA 95833 9 Telephone: (916) 271-0688 10 RYAN P. FRIEDMAN , S.B.N. 252244 FRIEDMAN LAW FIRM, INC. 11 1383 Garden Hwy., Ste. 200 Sacramento, CA 95833 12 Telephone: (916) 800-4454 Attorneys for Plaintiff 13 ARSEN ABRAMYAN and NARINA ZAKHARYAN 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 ARSEN ABRAMYAN and NARINA 17 ZAKHARYAN, 18 v. Plaintiffs, 19 GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY, and 20 Does 1-40, inclusive, Defendants. 21 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:16-cv-01069-MCE-AC STIPULATION TO MODIFY INITIAL PRETRIAL ORDER AND JOINT RULE 26(F) REPORT REGARDING DATES OF DISCOVERY CUT OFF, INITIAL DISCLOSURES, AND TRIAL DATE; ORDER THEREON 22 23 It is hereby stipulated by the Parties in the instant action through their 24 attorneys of record as follows: 25 1. Pursuant to Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the 26 parties held their discovery and planning conference by teleconference on July 27 18, 2016 and submitted a joint report filed on August 1, 2016. 28 ///// Case No. 2:16-CV-01069-MCE-AC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Gilbert, Kelly Crowley & Jennett LLP Attorneys at Law 4300627.1 30691-00029 GMK 2. 1 At the time that the Joint Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, Rule 2 26(f) Joint Conference Report was filed, a motion to dismiss filed by Defendant 3 GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY was still pending before the Court. 3. 4 5 At the time that the Joint Conference Report was filed the parties believed that they would shortly be receiving a ruling from the Court. 4. 6 At the time that the Joint Conference Report was filed the parties 7 had agreed to a trial date in or around August 2, 2017 and to a discovery 8 completion date in or around May 19, 2017. 5. 9 At the time that the Joint Conference Report was filed, the Parties 10 agreed that Initial disclosures under Rule 26(a)(1) would be made on or before 21 11 days after the Court’s ruling on defendant’s 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss then set for 12 August 11, 2016. 6. 13 14 At the time that the Joint Conference Report was filed, the parties stipulated to the need to take the following discovery: a. 15 The Parties anticipated taking at least 6 depositions and 16 agreed that if the matter was converted into a class action they would waive the 17 10-deposition limit set out in Rule 30(a)(2)(A)(i). The parties agreed that 18 depositions shall not exceed 3 days or 21 hours. Depositions will be limited to 7 19 hours a day. b. 20 Interrogatories. Shall be conducted pursuant to Rule 33(a)(1) 21 except that each party shall be limited to fifty (50) interrogatories and responses 22 shall be due 45 days after service c. 24 Request for admissions. Shall be conducted pursuant to Rule 36. 34. 25 26 Production of documents. Shall be conducted pursuant to Rule (3) 23 7. Defendants have just recently filed an answer with the Court on 27 March 20 2017 and filed an amended answer March 31, 217, the case is now at 28 issue as an answer is on file. -2- Gilbert, Kelly Crowley & Jennett LLP Attorneys at Law STIPULATION AND ORDER 4300627.1 30691-00029 1 8. Pursuant to their Rule 26(f) Joint Report the parties were waiting for 2 the court to make its ruling prior to engaging in discovery, so that the issues were 3 clear as to what discovery was warranted. Since the Order on the Motion to 4 Dismiss was not filed until March 10, 2017 and an answer not filed until March 5 20, 2017, good cause exists pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil 6 Procedure to amend the Pretrial Order Dated May 19, 2016, and the Stipulations 7 under Rule 26(f) to change the dates for initial disclosures, discovery cut off, and 8 the proposed trial dates as follows: 9 a. The Rule 26 initial disclosures shall occur on or before 4/21/17; 10 b. The Discovery Cut Off will be extended from May 19, 2016 11 until October 10, 2017 (approximately the length of time from the date the 12 original hearing on the motion to dismiss was to be heard on August 11, 2017 13 and the date the decision on the motion to dismiss was entered by the Court on 14 March 10, 2017.) 15 16 c. The Trial Date be scheduled on or about May 14, 2018. Dated: March 31, 2017 17 GILBERT, KELLY, CROWLEY & JENNETT LLP 18 By: 19 /S/ GLENN M. KENNA TIMOTHY W. KENNA, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION GLENN M. KENNA Attorneys for Defendant GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY 20 21 22 23 Dated: March 31, 2017 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 24 By: 25 /S/ AS AUTHORIZED ON [DATE] KEVIN W. HARRIS Attorneys for Plaintiff ARSEN ABRAMYAN and NARINA ZACKARYAN 26 27 28 -3- Gilbert, Kelly Crowley & Jennett LLP Attorneys at Law STIPULATION AND ORDER 4300627.1 30691-00029 1 Dated: March 31, 2017 FRIEDMAN LAW FIRM, INC. 2 By: 3 /S/ AS AUTHORIZED ON [DATE] RAYN P. FRIEDMAN Attorneys for Plaintiff ARSEN ABRAMYAN and NARINA ZACKARYAN 4 5 6 ORDER 7 8 Having determined that good cause exists under Federal Rule of Civil 9 Procedure 16(b) to modify the Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order and the dates 10 proposed in the Parties Rule 26 Report, the Court directs as follows: 11 a. The Rule 26 initial disclosures shall occur on April 21, 2017; 12 b. The Discovery Cut Off will be extended from May 19, 2016 until 13 October 10, 2017 (approximately the length of time from the date the 14 original hearing on the motion to dismiss was to be heard on August 15 11, 2017 and the date the decision on the motion to dismiss was 16 entered by the Court on March 10, 2017.) 17 c. In accordance with the Court’s Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order (ECF 18 No. 3), disclosure of expert witnesses and the deadline for filing any 19 dispositive motions shall be calculated in accordance with the extended 20 discovery date. Also in accordance with the Scheduling Order, the 21 parties are directed to file a Joint Notice of Trial Readiness at which 22 time a trial date will be set. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 Dated: April 12, 2017 25 26 27 28 -4- Gilbert, Kelly Crowley & Jennett LLP Attorneys at Law STIPULATION AND ORDER 4300627.1 30691-00029

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?