Malaivanh v. Humphreys College et al

Filing 27

STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/6/17, ORDERING that Initial disclosures shall have been completed by 1/27/2017. All discovery shall be completed by 1/24/2018. Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 11/2/2017, and rebuttal of expert witnesses disclosure due by 12/4/2017. All expert discovery shall be completed by 1/24/2018. All dispositive motions, except motions for continuances, temporary restraining orders or other emergency appl ications, shall be heard no later than 8/11/2017. The Final Pretrial Conference is SET for 3/9/2018 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. The parties shall file a joint pretrial conference statement by 2/16/2018. The Jury Trial is SET for 4/9/2018 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Trial briefs are due by 3/26/2018. (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

LEANNA MALAIVANH,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.

STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)

HUMPHREYS COLLEGE; et al.,

15

No. 2:16-CV-1081 KJM GGH

ORDER

Defendants.

16
17
An initial scheduling conference was held in this case on January 13, 2017. Phillip

18
19

Mastagni appeared for plaintiff; William Tickle and Loren Lunsford appeared for defendants.

20

Having reviewed the parties’ Joint Status Report filed on January 9, 2017, and

21

discussed a schedule for the case with counsel at the hearing, the court makes the following

22

orders:

23

I.

SERVICE OF PROCESS
All named defendants have been served and no further service is permitted without

24
25

leave of court, good cause having been shown. Defendants contend JDS Consultations is sued

26

erroneously as JSD Consultations.

27

/////

28

/////
1

1

II.

2

ADDITIONAL PARTIES/AMENDMENTS/PLEADINGS
Depending on the court’s resolution of the pending motion to dismiss, plaintiff

3

may be given leave to amend her complaint. Once an answer is filed, no other joinder of parties

4

or amendments to pleadings is permitted without leave of court, good cause having been shown.

5

See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b); Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604 (9th Cir. 1992).

6

III.

JURISDICTION/VENUE

7

Plaintiff believes jurisdiction is predicated upon 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 42 U.S.C.

8

§ 2000e-5(f)(3). Defendants have raised questions about jurisdiction, which may be resolved on

9

the pending motion to dismiss. Venue is not disputed.

10

IV.

11

DISCOVERY
Initial disclosures as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) shall have

12

been completed by January 27, 2017, and shall have provided information related to the

13

contentions of Humphreys College and Jesse De La Cruz and/or JDS Consultation as set forth in

14

the parties’ Joint Statement at pages 3 and 4. All discovery shall be completed by January 24,

15

2018. In this context, “completed” means that all discovery shall have been conducted so that all

16

depositions have been taken and any disputes relative to discovery shall have been resolved by

17

appropriate order if necessary and, where discovery has been ordered, the order has been obeyed.

18

All motions to compel discovery must be noticed on the magistrate judge’s calendar in

19

accordance with the local rules of this court. While the assigned magistrate judge reviews

20

proposed discovery phase protective orders, requests to seal or redact are decided by Judge

21

Mueller as discussed in more detail below. In addition, while the assigned magistrate judge

22

handles discovery motions, the magistrate judge cannot change the schedule set in this order,

23

except that the magistrate judge may modify a discovery cutoff to the extent such modification

24

does not have the effect of requiring a change to the balance of the schedule.

25

V.

26

DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESSES
All counsel are to designate in writing, file with the court, and serve upon all other

27

parties the name, address, and area of expertise of each expert that they propose to tender at trial

28

not later than November 2, 2017. The designation shall be accompanied by a written report
2

1

prepared and signed by the witness. The report shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B).

2

By December 4, 2017, any party who previously disclosed expert witnesses may submit a

3

supplemental list of expert witnesses who will express an opinion on a subject covered by an

4

expert designated by an adverse party, if the party supplementing an expert witness designation

5

has not previously retained an expert to testify on that subject. The supplemental designation

6

shall be accompanied by a written report, which shall also comply with the conditions stated

7

above.

8

Failure of a party to comply with the disclosure schedule as set forth above in all

9

likelihood will preclude that party from calling the expert witness at the time of trial. An expert

10

witness not appearing on the designation will not be permitted to testify unless the party offering

11

the witness demonstrates: (a) that the necessity for the witness could not have been reasonably

12

anticipated at the time the list was proffered; (b) that the court and opposing counsel were

13

promptly notified upon discovery of the witness; and (c) that the witness was promptly made

14

available for deposition.

15

For purposes of this scheduling order, an “expert” is any person who may be used

16

at trial to present evidence under Rules 702, 703 and 705 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, which

17

include both “percipient experts” (persons who, because of their expertise, have rendered expert

18

opinions in the normal course of their work duties or observations pertinent to the issues in the

19

case) and “retained experts” (persons specifically designated by a party to be a testifying expert

20

for the purposes of litigation). A party shall identify whether a disclosed expert is percipient,

21

retained, or both. It will be assumed that a party designating a retained expert has acquired the

22

express permission of the witness to be so listed. Parties designating percipient experts must state

23

in the designation who is responsible for arranging the deposition of such persons.

24

All experts designated are to be fully prepared at the time of designation to render

25

an informed opinion, and give the bases for their opinion, so that they will be able to give full and

26

complete testimony at any deposition taken by the opposing party. Experts will not be permitted

27

to testify at trial as to any information gathered or evaluated, or opinion formed, after deposition

28

taken subsequent to designation. All expert discovery shall be completed by January 24, 2018.
3

1

VI.

MOTION HEARING SCHEDULE

2

All dispositive motions, except motions for continuances, temporary restraining

3

orders or other emergency applications, shall be heard no later than August 11, 2017.1 The

4

parties may obtain available hearing dates by checking Judge Mueller’s page on the court’s

5

website.

6
7

All purely legal issues are to be resolved by timely pretrial motions. Local Rule
230 governs the calendaring and procedures of civil motions; the following provisions also apply:

8

(a)

The opposition and reply must be filed by 4:00 p.m. on the day due; and

9

(b)

When the last day for filing an opposition brief falls on a legal holiday, the

10

opposition brief shall be filed on the last court day immediately preceding the legal holiday.

11

Failure to comply with Local Rule 230(c), as modified by this order, may be deemed consent to

12

the motion and the court may dispose of the motion summarily. Brydges v. Lewis, 18 F.3d 651,

13

652-53 (9th Cir. 1994).

14

The court values the importance of training young attorneys. The parties are

15

encouraged to consider assigning oral argument to a young attorney. If a written request for oral

16

argument is filed before a hearing, stating an attorney of four or fewer years out of law school

17

will argue the oral argument, then the court will ordinarily hold the hearing, although the court’s

18

schedule and calendar may require the hearing to be reset. Otherwise, the court may find it

19

appropriate in some actions to submit a motion without oral argument.

20

The court places a page limit of twenty (20) pages on all moving papers, twenty

21

(20) pages on oppositions, and ten (10) pages for replies. All requests for page limit increases

22

must be made in writing at least fourteen (14) days prior to the filing of the motion.

23

Prior to filing a motion in a case in which the parties are represented by counsel,

24

counsel shall engage in a pre-filing meet and confer to discuss thoroughly the substance of the

25

contemplated motion and any potential resolution. Plaintiff’s counsel should carefully evaluate

26

the defendant’s contentions as to deficiencies in the complaint and in many instances the party

27
28

1

Note that this date may not correspond to a law and motion calendar date.
4

1

considering a motion should agree to any amendment that would cure a curable defect. Counsel

2

should discuss the issues sufficiently so that if a motion of any kind is filed, including for

3

summary judgment, the briefing is directed only to those substantive issues requiring resolution

4

by the court. Counsel should resolve minor procedural or other non-substantive matters during

5

the meet and confer. A notice of motion shall contain a certification by counsel filing the

6

motion that meet and confer efforts have been exhausted, with a brief summary of meet and

7

confer efforts.

8
9

The parties are cautioned that failure to raise a dispositive legal issue that could
have been tendered to the court by proper pretrial motion prior to the dispositive motion cut-off

10

date may constitute waiver of such issue.

11

VII.

12

SEALING
No document will be sealed, nor shall a redacted document be filed, without the

13

prior approval of the court. If a document for which sealing or redaction is sought relates to the

14

record on a motion to be decided by Judge Mueller, the request to seal or redact should be

15

directed to her and not the assigned Magistrate Judge. All requests to seal or redact shall be

16

governed by Local Rules 141 (sealing) and 140 (redaction); protective orders covering the

17

discovery phase of litigation shall not govern the filing of sealed or redacted documents on the

18

public docket. The court will only consider requests to seal or redact filed by the proponent of

19

sealing or redaction. If a party plans to make a filing that includes material an opposing party has

20

identified as confidential and potentially subject to sealing, the filing party shall provide the

21

opposing party with sufficient notice in advance of filing to allow for the seeking of an order of

22

sealing or redaction from the court.

23

VIII.

24

FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
The Final Pretrial Conference is set for March 9, 2018, at 10:00 a.m. At least one

25

of the attorneys who will conduct the trial for each of the parties shall attend the Final Pretrial

26

Conference. If by reason of illness or other unavoidable circumstance a trial attorney is unable to

27

attend, the attorney who attends in place of the trial attorney shall have equal familiarity with the

28

case and equal authorization to make commitments on behalf of the client.
5

1

Counsel for all parties are to be fully prepared for trial at the time of the Final

2

Pretrial Conference, with no matters remaining to be accomplished except production of

3

witnesses for oral testimony. The parties shall confer and file a joint pretrial conference

4

statement by February 16, 2018. The provisions of Local Rule 281 shall apply with respect to

5

the matters to be included in the joint pretrial statement. In addition to those subjects listed in

6

Local Rule 281(b), the parties are to provide the court with the following:

7
8

- A plain, concise statement that identifies every non-discovery motion previously
tendered to the court and its resolution.

9

- A concise, joint list of undisputed core facts that are relevant to each claim.

10

Disputed core facts should then be identified in the same manner. The parties are reminded not to

11

identify every fact in dispute but only those disputed facts that are essential to the formulation of

12

each claim. Each disputed fact and undisputed fact should be separately numbered or lettered.

13

Where the parties are unable to agree on the core disputed facts, they should nevertheless list core

14

disputed facts in the above manner.

15

- Concise lists of disputed evidentiary issues that will be the subject of a party’s

16

motion in limine, and whether the parties believe resolution of any of these motions will be

17

necessary before the first day of trial.

18

- Each party’s points of law, which concisely describe the legal basis or theory

19

underlying their claims and defenses. Points of law should reflect issues derived from the core

20

undisputed and disputed facts. Parties shall not include argument with any point of law; the

21

parties may include concise arguments in their trial briefs.

22

- A joint statement of the case in plain concise language, which will be read to the

23

jury during voir dire and at the beginning of the trial. The purpose of the joint statement is to

24

inform the jury what the case is about.

25

- The parties’ position on the number of jurors to be impaneled to try the case.

26

Discovery documents to be listed in the pretrial statement shall not include

27

documents to be used only for impeachment and in rebuttal.

28

/////
6

1

The parties are reminded that pursuant to Local Rule 281 they are required to

2

attach to the Final Pretrial Conference Statement an exhibit listing witnesses and exhibits they

3

propose to offer at trial. After the name of each witness, each party shall provide a brief

4

statement of the nature of the testimony to be proffered. The parties may file a joint list or each

5

party may file separate lists. These list(s) shall not be contained in the body of the Final Pretrial

6

Conference Statement itself, but shall be attached as separate documents to be used as addenda to

7

the Final Pretrial Order.

8

Plaintiff’s exhibits shall be listed numerically. Defendant’s exhibits shall be listed

9

alphabetically. The parties shall use the standard exhibit stickers provided by the court: pink for

10

plaintiff and blue for defendant. In the event that the alphabet is exhausted, the exhibits shall be

11

marked “AA-ZZ”. However, if the amount of defendant exhibits exceeds “ZZ” exhibits shall be

12

then listed as AAA, BBB, CCC etc. All multi-page exhibits shall be stapled or otherwise fastened

13

together and each page within the exhibit shall be numbered. The list of exhibits shall not include

14

excerpts of depositions to be used only for impeachment. In the event that plaintiff(s) and

15

defendant(s) offer the same exhibit during trial, that exhibit shall be referred to by the designation

16

the exhibit is first identified. The court cautions the parties to pay attention to this detail so that

17

all concerned, including the jury, will not be confused by one exhibit being identified with both a

18

number and a letter. The parties are encouraged to consult concerning exhibits and, to the extent

19

possible, provide joint exhibits, which shall be designated as JX and listed numerically, e.g., JX-

20

1, JX-2.

21

The Final Pretrial Order will contain a stringent standard for the offering at trial of

22

witnesses and exhibits not listed in the Final Pretrial Order, and the parties are cautioned that the

23

standard will be strictly applied. On the other hand, the listing of exhibits or witnesses that a

24

party does not intend to offer will be viewed as an abuse of the court’s processes.

25
26

Counsel shall produce all trial exhibits to Casey Schultz, the Courtroom Deputy,
no later than 3:00 p.m. on the Friday before trial.

27
28

Failure to comply with Local Rule 281, as modified by this order, may be grounds
for sanctions.
7

1

The parties also are reminded that pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of

2

Civil Procedure it will be their duty at the Final Pretrial Conference to aid the court in: (a) the

3

formulation and simplification of issues and the elimination of frivolous claims or defenses; (b)

4

the settling of facts that should properly be admitted; and (c) the avoidance of unnecessary proof

5

and cumulative evidence. Counsel must cooperatively prepare the joint Final Pretrial Conference

6

Statement and participate in good faith at the Final Pretrial Conference with these aims in mind.2

7

A failure to do so may result in the imposition of sanctions which may include monetary

8

sanctions, orders precluding proof, elimination of claims or defenses, or such other sanctions as

9

the court deems appropriate.

10

Concurrently with the filing of the Joint Final Pretrial Conference Statement,

11

counsel shall submit to chambers the word processable version of the Statement, in its entirety

12

(including the witness and exhibit lists) to: [e-mail].

13

IX.

MOTIONS IN LIMINE

14

All motions in limine must be filed in conjunction with the joint pretrial statement.

15

In most cases, motions in limine are addressed and resolved on the morning of the first day of

16

trial. As noted above, the parties may alert the court at the final pretrial conference and in their

17

final pretrial statement that a particular motion or motions should be resolved earlier. At the final

18

pretrial conference, the court will then set a briefing and hearing schedule on these motions in

19

limine as necessary.

20

The parties are reminded that a motion in limine is a pretrial procedural device

21

designed to address the admissibility of evidence. The court looks with disfavor upon

22

dispositional motions presented at the Final Pretrial Conference or at trial in the guise of motions

23

in limine.

24

/////

25

/////

26

2

27
28

“If the pretrial conference discloses that no material facts are in dispute and that the undisputed
facts entitle one of the parties to judgment as a matter of law,” the court may summarily dispose
of the case or claims. Portsmouth Square v. Shareholders Protective Comm., 770 F.2d 866, 86869 (9th Cir. 1985).
8

1

X.

TRIAL SETTING

2

The jury trial is set for April 9, 2018 at 9:00 a.m. The parties estimate a trial

3

length of approximately five (5) to ten (10) days. Trial briefs are due by March 26, 2018.

4

XI.

SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

5

No settlement conference is currently scheduled. A settlement conference may be

6

set at the time of the Final Pretrial Conference or at an earlier time at the parties’ request. In the

7

event that an earlier court settlement conference date or referral to the Voluntary Dispute

8

Resolution Program (VDRP) is requested, the parties shall file said request jointly, in writing.

9

Because the case will be tried to a jury, all parties should be prepared to advise the court whether

10

they will stipulate to the trial judge acting as settlement judge and waive disqualification by virtue

11

thereof.

12

Counsel are instructed to have a principal with full settlement authority present at

13

any Settlement Conference or to be fully authorized to settle the matter on any terms. Each judge

14

has different requirements for the submission of settlement conference statements; the appropriate

15

instructions will be sent to you after the settlement judge is assigned.

16

XII.

17

MODIFICATION OF STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER
The parties are reminded that pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil

18

Procedure, the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order shall not be modified except by leave of court

19

upon a showing of good cause. Agreement of the parties by stipulation alone does not constitute

20

good cause. Except in extraordinary circumstances, unavailability of witnesses or counsel does

21

not constitute good cause.

22

As noted, the assigned magistrate judge is authorized to modify only the discovery

23

dates shown above to the extent any such modification does not impact the balance of the

24

schedule of the case.

25

/////

26

/////

27

/////

28

/////
9

1
2
3
4
5

XIII.

OBJECTIONS TO STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER
This Status Order will become final without further order of the court unless

objections are filed within fourteen (14) calendar days of service of this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: February 6, 2017

6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
10