Fields v. Paramo et al
Filing
24
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 9/6/2017 GRANTING 23 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff's response to 19 Motion to Dismiss is due 60 days from the date of this order's entry. (Henshaw, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
CARLTON FIELDS,
11
12
13
No. 2:16-cv-01085 JAM AC P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
DANIEL PARAMO, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
16
Carlton Fields (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this action pursuant
17
to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 11, 2017, defendant Alexander Liu filed a motion to dismiss.
18
ECF No. 19. On September 1, 2017, plaintiff sought a sixty day extension of time to file an
19
opposition to that motion. ECF No. 23. He claims that he is currently being housed in a mental
20
health crisis bed and does not have access to his property, including his legal materials. Id. at 1.
21
Good cause being shown, plaintiff’s motion will be granted.
22
It is THEREFORE ORDERED that:
23
1.
Plaintiff’s motion for extension of time (ECF No. 23) is GRANTED; and
24
2.
His response to defendant Liu’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 19) is due sixty days
25
from the date of this order’s entry.
26
DATED: September 6, 2017
27
28
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?