Lull et al v. County of Sacramento et al
Filing
36
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/11/17 ORDERING that Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint is now due no later than 9/8/17; Defendants have until 9/22/17, to respond to the Second Amended Complaint in any manner permitted by the FRCP. Plaintiffs' and the County Defendants' initial disclosures shall be served within fourteen days after the County Defendants file an answer to the complaint. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
CRIS C. VAUGHAN, SBN 99568
VAUGHAN & ASSOCIATES
6207 South Walnut Street, Suite 800
Loomis, CA 95650
Telephone: 916-660-9401
Facsimile:
916-660-9378
cvaughan@adasolutionsgroup.com
Attorneys for AUTOTEK, INC. and
CHRISTOPHER LULL, Plaintiffs
ROBERT L. CHALFANT, SBN 203051
WENDY MOTOOKA, SBN 233589
CREGGER & CHALFANT, LLP
701 University Avenue, Suite 110
Sacramento, CA 95825
Telephone: 916-426-1889
Facsimile:
916-443-2124
Attorneys for the COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO Defendants
STEPHANIE L. QUINN, SBN 216655
SUSAN A. DENARDO, SBN 235166
MURPHY, CAMPBELL, ALLISTON & QUINN
8801 Folsom Boulevard, Suite 230
Sacramento, CA 95826
Telephone: 916-400-2300
Facsimile:
916-400-2311
Attorneys for SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY
DISTRICT, Defendant
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
18
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
19
CHRISTOPHER LULL, et al.
20
21
22
23
24
Plaintiffs,
v.
Case No. 2:16-cv-01093-KJM-CKD
SECOND STIPULATION TO
EXTEND PLAINTIFFS’ TIME TO
FILE SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT; ORDER THEREON
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO;
et al,
Defendants.
25
1
SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND PLAINTIFFS’ TIME TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
2:16-cv-01093-KJM-CKD
1
2
WHEREAS on July 25, 2017, Judge Kimberly J. Mueller issued her Order [Doc.
31] on Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss;
3
WHEREAS in said Order, Judge Mueller granted Plaintiffs fourteen (14) days
4
from the date of the Order, July 25, 2017, or to and until August 8, 2017, to file an
5
amended complaint;
6
7
WHEREAS, the parties previously stipulated to an extension of time for Plaintiffs
to file an amended complaint [Doc. 32];
8
WHEREAS, Judge Mueller granted Plaintiffs’ request for additional time, to and
9
until September 1, 2017, to file an amended complaint based upon the parties’ previous
10
11
12
stipulation [Doc. 33];
WHEREAS Plaintiffs desire additional time, to and until September 8, 2017, to file
an amended complaint;
13
WHEREAS Defendants agree to allow Plaintiffs this additional time to amend;
14
WHEREAS the County Defendants and Plaintiffs wish to delay service of their
15
initial disclosures until after the pleadings have settled, and Defendant SMUD has
16
already served its initial disclosures and does not object to this agreement between the
17
County Defendants and Plaintiffs;
18
19
20
21
22
THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate, by and through their counsel of
record, to the following:
1.
Plaintiffs’ time to file their Second Amended Complaint is extended to
September 8, 2017;
2.
Defendants shall have until September 22, 2017, in which to respond to
23
the Second Amended Complaint in any manner permitted under the Federal Rules of
24
Civil Procedure; and
25
3.
The County Defendants and Plaintiffs shall have until two weeks after the
2
SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND PLAINTIFFS’ TIME TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
2:16-cv-01093-KJM-CKD
1
2
County Defendants answer the complaint in which to serve initial disclosures.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Respectfully submitted,
3
4
Dated: September 11, 2017
5
/s/ Cris C. Vaughan
CRIS C. VAUGHAN
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Autotek, Inc.
and Christopher Lull
6
7
8
VAUGHAN & ASSOCIATES
Dated: September 11, 2017
9
CREGGER & CHALFANT LLP
/s/ Wendy Motooka
WENDY MOTOOKA
Attorneys for Defendants County of
Sacramento, Lori Moss, Leighann Moffitt, Brian
Washko, Robin Rasmussen, Bob Ivie, John
Muzinich, Scott Purvis, Russ Williams, Wayne
Eastman, June Powells-Mays, Tammy Derby,
Paul Munoz, Cyndi Lee, Florence Evans and
Jared Wickliff
10
11
12
13
14
15
Dated: September 11, 2017
16
MURPHY, CAMPBELL,
ALLISTON & QUINN
/s/ Susan Denardo
SUSAN DENARDO
Attorneys for Defendant Sacramento
Municipal Utility District
17
18
19
ORDER
20
After considering the Stipulation by and between the parties through their counsel
21
22
of record, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1.
23
8, 2017;
24
2.
Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint is now due no later than September
25
Defendants have until September 22, 2017, to respond to the Second
Amended Complaint in any manner permitted by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure;
3
SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND PLAINTIFFS’ TIME TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
2:16-cv-01093-KJM-CKD
1
2
3
4
3.
Plaintiffs’ and the County Defendants’ initial disclosures shall be served
within fourteen days after the County Defendants file an answer to the complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: September 11, 2017.
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
4
SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND PLAINTIFFS’ TIME TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
2:16-cv-01093-KJM-CKD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?