Lull et al v. County of Sacramento et al

Filing 36

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/11/17 ORDERING that Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint is now due no later than 9/8/17; Defendants have until 9/22/17, to respond to the Second Amended Complaint in any manner permitted by the FRCP. Plaintiffs' and the County Defendants' initial disclosures shall be served within fourteen days after the County Defendants file an answer to the complaint. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 CRIS C. VAUGHAN, SBN 99568 VAUGHAN & ASSOCIATES 6207 South Walnut Street, Suite 800 Loomis, CA 95650 Telephone: 916-660-9401 Facsimile: 916-660-9378 cvaughan@adasolutionsgroup.com Attorneys for AUTOTEK, INC. and CHRISTOPHER LULL, Plaintiffs ROBERT L. CHALFANT, SBN 203051 WENDY MOTOOKA, SBN 233589 CREGGER & CHALFANT, LLP 701 University Avenue, Suite 110 Sacramento, CA 95825 Telephone: 916-426-1889 Facsimile: 916-443-2124 Attorneys for the COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO Defendants STEPHANIE L. QUINN, SBN 216655 SUSAN A. DENARDO, SBN 235166 MURPHY, CAMPBELL, ALLISTON & QUINN 8801 Folsom Boulevard, Suite 230 Sacramento, CA 95826 Telephone: 916-400-2300 Facsimile: 916-400-2311 Attorneys for SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT, Defendant 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 CHRISTOPHER LULL, et al. 20 21 22 23 24 Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 2:16-cv-01093-KJM-CKD SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND PLAINTIFFS’ TIME TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; ORDER THEREON COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; et al, Defendants. 25 1 SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND PLAINTIFFS’ TIME TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 2:16-cv-01093-KJM-CKD 1 2 WHEREAS on July 25, 2017, Judge Kimberly J. Mueller issued her Order [Doc. 31] on Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss; 3 WHEREAS in said Order, Judge Mueller granted Plaintiffs fourteen (14) days 4 from the date of the Order, July 25, 2017, or to and until August 8, 2017, to file an 5 amended complaint; 6 7 WHEREAS, the parties previously stipulated to an extension of time for Plaintiffs to file an amended complaint [Doc. 32]; 8 WHEREAS, Judge Mueller granted Plaintiffs’ request for additional time, to and 9 until September 1, 2017, to file an amended complaint based upon the parties’ previous 10 11 12 stipulation [Doc. 33]; WHEREAS Plaintiffs desire additional time, to and until September 8, 2017, to file an amended complaint; 13 WHEREAS Defendants agree to allow Plaintiffs this additional time to amend; 14 WHEREAS the County Defendants and Plaintiffs wish to delay service of their 15 initial disclosures until after the pleadings have settled, and Defendant SMUD has 16 already served its initial disclosures and does not object to this agreement between the 17 County Defendants and Plaintiffs; 18 19 20 21 22 THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate, by and through their counsel of record, to the following: 1. Plaintiffs’ time to file their Second Amended Complaint is extended to September 8, 2017; 2. Defendants shall have until September 22, 2017, in which to respond to 23 the Second Amended Complaint in any manner permitted under the Federal Rules of 24 Civil Procedure; and 25 3. The County Defendants and Plaintiffs shall have until two weeks after the 2 SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND PLAINTIFFS’ TIME TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 2:16-cv-01093-KJM-CKD 1 2 County Defendants answer the complaint in which to serve initial disclosures. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Respectfully submitted, 3 4 Dated: September 11, 2017 5 /s/ Cris C. Vaughan CRIS C. VAUGHAN Attorneys for Plaintiffs Autotek, Inc. and Christopher Lull 6 7 8 VAUGHAN & ASSOCIATES Dated: September 11, 2017 9 CREGGER & CHALFANT LLP /s/ Wendy Motooka WENDY MOTOOKA Attorneys for Defendants County of Sacramento, Lori Moss, Leighann Moffitt, Brian Washko, Robin Rasmussen, Bob Ivie, John Muzinich, Scott Purvis, Russ Williams, Wayne Eastman, June Powells-Mays, Tammy Derby, Paul Munoz, Cyndi Lee, Florence Evans and Jared Wickliff 10 11 12 13 14 15 Dated: September 11, 2017 16 MURPHY, CAMPBELL, ALLISTON & QUINN /s/ Susan Denardo SUSAN DENARDO Attorneys for Defendant Sacramento Municipal Utility District 17 18 19 ORDER 20 After considering the Stipulation by and between the parties through their counsel 21 22 of record, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. 23 8, 2017; 24 2. Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint is now due no later than September 25 Defendants have until September 22, 2017, to respond to the Second Amended Complaint in any manner permitted by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; 3 SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND PLAINTIFFS’ TIME TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 2:16-cv-01093-KJM-CKD 1 2 3 4 3. Plaintiffs’ and the County Defendants’ initial disclosures shall be served within fourteen days after the County Defendants file an answer to the complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: September 11, 2017. 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 4 SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND PLAINTIFFS’ TIME TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 2:16-cv-01093-KJM-CKD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?