Meyers v. County of Sacramento et al

Filing 26

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/7/18 ORDERING that No later than thirty (30) days from the date of this order, the parties shall file reports on the status of this litigation and any pertinent issues, including whether a settlement conference would be beneficial at this time; No later than thirty (30) days from the date of this order, the parties shall file proposed pretrial deadlines as described above.(Becknal, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

GLEN MEYERS,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:16-cv-01121 MCE CKD (PS)

v.

ORDER

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. On July 18, 2018, the matter was referred to a

17
18

United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c).
Defendants have filed an answer, but there is currently no pretrial schedule in effect. (See

19
20

ECF No. 23.) Good cause appearing, the court will order the parties to file status reports and

21

proposed pretrial dates, including discovery and dispositive motion deadlines. The parties are

22

strongly encouraged to submit a joint proposal if possible. The parties need not propose

23

deadlines beyond the dispositive motion deadline at this time.

24

////

25

////

26

////

27

////

28

////
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1.

No later than thirty (30) days from the date of this order, the parties shall file reports

3

on the status of this litigation and any pertinent issues, including whether a settlement

4

conference would be beneficial at this time.

5
6
7

2. No later than thirty (30) days from the date of this order, the parties shall file proposed
pretrial deadlines as described above.
Dated: August 7, 2018

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12

2/meyers1121.order

13
14
15
16
17
18
19

2 / ac v fairfield.jo

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2