Meyers v. County of Sacramento et al
Filing
69
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 8/11/20 ADOPTING 62 Findings and Recommendations. Plaintiff's action is DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:16-cv-01121-MCE-CKD
GLEN MEYERS,
ORDER
v.
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
On June 15, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein, which
17
18
were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and
19
recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 62. After the deadline to file
20
objections had passed, attorney Dennise Henderson filed a “Response to Magistrate’s
21
Recommendation of Dismissal.” ECF No. 63. Plaintiff is proceeding in propria persona, and Ms.
22
Henderson is not counsel of record. Defendants filed a response to Ms. Henderson’s filing. ECF
23
No. 65.
24
25
The Court has reviewed the file and concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Proposed
Findings and Recommendations in full.
26
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
27
1. The Magistrate’s Findings and Recommendations (ECF No. 62) are ADOPTED in
28
full;
1
1
2. Plaintiff’s action is DISMISSED; and
2
3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
Dated: August 11, 2020
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?