Meyers v. County of Sacramento et al

Filing 69

ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 8/11/20 ADOPTING 62 Findings and Recommendations. Plaintiff's action is DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:16-cv-01121-MCE-CKD GLEN MEYERS, ORDER v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 On June 15, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein, which 17 18 were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 19 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 62. After the deadline to file 20 objections had passed, attorney Dennise Henderson filed a “Response to Magistrate’s 21 Recommendation of Dismissal.” ECF No. 63. Plaintiff is proceeding in propria persona, and Ms. 22 Henderson is not counsel of record. Defendants filed a response to Ms. Henderson’s filing. ECF 23 No. 65. 24 25 The Court has reviewed the file and concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in full. 26 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 27 1. The Magistrate’s Findings and Recommendations (ECF No. 62) are ADOPTED in 28 full; 1 1 2. Plaintiff’s action is DISMISSED; and 2 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 Dated: August 11, 2020 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?