Harrison v. Flores et al

Filing 16

ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 4/19/2017 ORDERING 15 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. (Reader, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

CARL HARRISON ,

12

No. 2:16-cv-1130 MCE CKD P

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

FLORES, et al.,

15

ORDER

Defendants.

16
17

On April 3, 2017, plaintiff filed a document the court construes as a request for

18

reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s March 22, 2017 order. ECF No. 15. Pursuant to E.D.

19

Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or

20

contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the

21

magistrate judge’s ruling is clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (ECF No.
15) is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 19, 2017