Harrison v. Flores et al

Filing 17

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 5/09/17 recommending that this action is dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

CARL HARRISON,

12

No. 2:16-cv-1130 MCE CKD P

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

FLORES, et al.,

15

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Defendants.

16
On March 22, 2017, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an

17
18

amended complaint was granted. Plaintiff was warned that failure to file an amended complaint

19

would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now

20

expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

21

RECOMMENDED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R.

22

Civ. P. 41(b).
These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge

23
24

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

25

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

26

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings and

27

Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time

28

/////

1

may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th

2

Cir. 1991).

3

Dated: May 9, 2017

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

4
5
6
7
8
9

1
harr1130.fta

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2