Harrison v. Flores et al

Filing 25

ORDER for INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:16-cv-1130) to Fresno (1:18-cv-525) signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 04/18/18. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CARL HARRISON, 12 No. 2:16-cv-1130 MCE CKD P Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 FLORES, et al., 15 ORDER Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 17 18 U.S.C. § 1983. In his third amended complaint, which is before the court for screening under 28 19 U.S.C. § 1915A(a), plaintiff alleges violations of his civil rights by defendant Sgt. Rodreguez. 20 The violations alleged in the third amended complaint took place in Kern County, which is part of 21 the Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See 22 Local Rule 120(d). Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action may, on the court’s own motion, 23 be transferred to the proper division of the court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the 24 Fresno Division of the court. 25 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 26 1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of 27 California sitting in Fresno; and 28 ///// 1 1 2 2. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be filed at: United States District Court Eastern District of California 2500 Tulare Street Fresno, CA 93721 3 4 5 Dated: April 18, 2018 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 1 harr1130.22 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?