Velasquez v. Robustelli
Filing
10
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 7/13/16 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DENICIO VELASQUEZ,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:16-cv-1131 JAM CKD P
v.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
J. ROBUSTELLI, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
On May 31, 2016, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed application to proceed in
17
18
forma pauperis within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in
19
dismissal. The thirty day period has now expired and plaintiff has not complied with the court’s
20
May 31, 2016 order.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without
21
22
prejudice.
These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge
23
24
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
25
after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections
26
with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings and
27
Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time
28
/////
1
1
may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th
2
Cir. 1991).
3
Dated: July 13, 2016
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
vela1131.fifp
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?