Johnson v. Pluralsight, LLC

Filing 42

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 8/20/2019 ORDERING plaintiff shall have a further extension of time, up to and including 9/2/2019, in which to serve responses to the Discovery Requests. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Scott J. Ferrell, Bar No. 202091 sferrell@pacifictrialattorneys.com Roger E. Borg, Bar No. 117765 rborg@pacifictrialattorneys.com PACIFIC TRIAL ATTORNEYS, P.C. 4100 Newport Place Drive, Suite 800 Newport Beach, California 92660 Telephone: (949) 706-6464 Facsimile: (949) 706-6469 Attorneys for Plaintiff KYLE JOHNSON 8 UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 KYLE JOHNSON, individually and on Case No. 2:16-cv-01148-MCE-CKD behalf of all others similarly situated, STIPULATION AND ORDER RE FURTHER EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE DISCOVERY Plaintiff, RESPONSES 14 15 16 17 v. PLURALSIGHT, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company; and DOES 1 – 10, inclusive, Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 Plaintiff Kyle Johnson (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Pluralsight, LLC (“Defendant”), through their counsel of record, state as follows: RECITALS 23 24 A. Defendant has served on Plaintiff several items of written discovery, 25 including Requests for Admissions, Set One, Special Interrogatories, Set One, and 26 Requests for Production, Set One (the “Discovery Requests”). Plaintiff’s responses to the 27 Discovery Requests were originally due on July 25, 2019, and which, pursuant to a 28 previous extension, are now due on August 16, 2019. -1STIPULATION AND ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE DISCOVERY RESPONES Case No. 2:16-cv-01148-MCE-CKD 1 B. Plaintiff and Defendant are currently engaged in settlement discussions. In 2 order to permit these discussions to proceed further, and to allow Plaintiff additional time 3 to prepare responses to the Discovery Requests, Plaintiff and Defendant have agreed that 4 Plaintiff shall have an extension of time, up to and including September 2, 2019, in which 5 to serve responses to the Discovery Requests. 6 7 WHEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendant, through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 8 9 10 11 12 STIPULATION 1. Plaintiff shall have a further extension of time, up to and including September 2, 2019, in which to serve responses to the Discovery Requests. Dated: August 20, 2019 13 /s/Roger E. Borg__________________ Roger E. Borg Attorneys for Plaintiff KYLE JOHNSON 14 15 16 PACIFIC TRIAL ATTORNEYS A Professional Corporation Dated: August 20, 2019 HATTON, PETRIE & STACKLER APC /s/John A. McMahon__________________ John A. McMahon Attorneys for Defendant PLURALSIGHT, LLC 17 18 19 20 ORDER 21 22 23 24 Good cause appearing therefor, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 20, 2019 25 26 27 28 -2STIPULATION AND ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE DISCOVERY RESPONES Case No. 2:16-cv-01148-MCE-CKD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?