Johnson v. Pluralsight, LLC

Filing 45

ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 9/10/2019 EXTENDING 43 Plaintiff's time up to and including 10/2/2019 in which to serve responses to the Discovery Requests. (Reader, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Scott J. Ferrell, Bar No. 202091
[e-mail]
Roger E. Borg, Bar No. 117765
[e-mail]
PACIFIC TRIAL ATTORNEYS, P.C.
4100 Newport Place Drive, Suite 800
Newport Beach, California 92660
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
KYLE JOHNSON

8

UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13

KYLE JOHNSON, individually and on Case No. 2:16-cv-01148-MCE-CKD
behalf of all others similarly situated,
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE
FURTHER EXTENSION OF TIME
TO SERVE DISCOVERY
Plaintiff,
RESPONSES

14

v.

15
16
17

PLURALSIGHT, LLC, a Nevada limited
liability company; and DOES 1 – 10,
inclusive,
Defendants.

18
19
20
21

Plaintiff Kyle Johnson (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Pluralsight, LLC (“Defendant”),
through their counsel of record, state as follows:
RECITALS

22
23

A.

Defendant has served on Plaintiff several items of written discovery,

24

including Requests for Admissions, Set One, Special Interrogatories, Set One, and

25

Requests for Production, Set One (the “Discovery Requests”). Plaintiff’s responses to the

26

Discovery Requests were originally due on July 25, 2019, and which, pursuant to a

27

previous extension, were then due on August 16, 2019, and now, pursuant to the most

28

recent extension, are now due on September 2, 2019.
-1STIPULATION AND ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE DISCOVERY RESPONES
Case No. 2:16-cv-01148-MCE-CKD

1

B.

Plaintiff and Defendant are still currently engaged in settlement discussions.

2

In order to permit these discussions to proceed further, and to allow Plaintiff additional

3

time to prepare responses to the Discovery Requests, Plaintiff and Defendant have agreed

4

that Plaintiff shall have an extension of time, up to and including October 2, 2019, in

5

which to serve responses to the Discovery Requests.

6
7

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendant, through their counsel of record, hereby
stipulate and agree as follows:

8
9
10
11

STIPULATION
1.

Plaintiff shall have a further extension of time, up to and including October

2, 2019, in which to serve responses to the Discovery Requests.
Dated: September 10, 2019

12
13

/s/Roger E. Borg__________________
Roger E. Borg
Attorneys for Plaintiff KYLE JOHNSON

14
15
16

PACIFIC TRIAL ATTORNEYS
A Professional Corporation

Dated: September 10, 2019

HATTON, PETRIE & STACKLER APC
/s/John A. McMahon__________________
John A. McMahon
Attorneys for Defendant PLURALSIGHT, LLC

17
18
19

ORDER

20
21
22
23

Good cause appearing therefor, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 10, 2019

24
25
26
27
28
-2STIPULATION AND ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE DISCOVERY RESPONES
Case No. 2:16-cv-01148-MCE-CKD