Davis v. T.C.C.F.
Filing
22
ORDER signed by District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 3/29/2017 ADOPTING IN FULL 19 Findings and Recommendations; GRANTING 15 Motion to Dismiss such that the petitioner's ground four for relief is dismissed; DEEMING the 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus amended to delete said claim. (Michel, G.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DAVID B. DAVIS,
12
13
14
No. 2:16-cv-1159-GEB-EFB P
Petitioner,
v.
ORDER
MARTIN FRINK,
15
Respondent.
16
17
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ of habeas
18
corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
19
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On February 7, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
21
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
22
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Petitioner has filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
24
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
25
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
26
court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
27
analysis.
28
In his objections, petitioner states that he wishes to delete his ineffective assistance of
1
1
counsel claim and proceed with the remaining claims.
2
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
3
1. The findings and recommendations filed February 7, 2017, are adopted in full;
4
2. Respondent’s July 29, 2016 motion to dismiss (ECF No. 15) is granted in part such
5
that petitioner’s ground four for relief (alleging ineffective assistance of counsel) is
6
dismissed and the petition is deemed amended to delete that claim.
7
Dated: March 29, 2017
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?