Gray v. Sacramento County Jail

Filing 14

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/19/2017 DISMISSING this action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. CASE CLOSED.(Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BERNARDOS GRAY, JR., 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. No. 2:16-cv-1172 KJN P ORDER SACRAMENTO COUNTY JAIL, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding, without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ยง 18 1983. Plaintiff has consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned. (ECF No. 6.) This action is 19 dismissed for the reasons stated herein. On November 14, 2016, an order served on plaintiff was returned unserved. Local Rule 20 21 183(b) requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change. 22 Accordingly, on November 16, 2016, the undersigned ordered plaintiff to show cause within 23 thirty days why this action should not be dismissed for his failure to keep the court apprised of his 24 current address. On November 29, 2016, the November 16, 2016 order was also returned 25 unserved. More than sixty-three days have passed since the November 14, 2016 court order was 26 27 returned by the postal service and plaintiff has failed to notify the court of a current address. 28 //// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice 2 for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 183(b). 3 Dated: January 19, 2017 4 5 6 7 Gray1172.dis 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?