Haney v. Johnson et al

Filing 115

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 02/12/20 ORDERING that the concerns raised by plaintiff in his 112 01/21/20 letter are deemed resolved. (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MONTE HANEY, 12 13 14 No. 2: 16-cv-1173 TLN KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER S. JOHNSON, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant 18 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff was transferred from High Desert State Prison (“HDSP”) to 19 California State Prison-Sacramento (“CSP-Sac”) for a settlement conference, held on January 7, 20 2020. This action settled. 21 On January 21, 2020, plaintiff filed a letter with the court stating that he had not been 22 returned to HDSP, where his legal materials and personal property were stored. (ECF No. 112.) 23 On January 30, 2020, the undersigned granted defendants ten days to inform the court whether 24 plaintiff had been returned to HDSP and whether his legal materials had been delivered to him. 25 (ECF No. 113.) 26 On February 6, 2020, defendants informed the court that plaintiff was transported to 27 HDSP on February 4, 2020. (ECF No. 114.) Defendants also informed the court that the HDSP 28 Litigation Coordinator advised that plaintiff should receive his legal property on February 10 or 1 1 2 11, 2020, barring unforeseen circumstances. (Id.) Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the concerns raised by plaintiff in 3 his January 21, 2020 letter (ECF No. 112) are deemed resolved. 4 Dated: February 12, 2020 5 6 7 Han1173.set 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?