Haney v. Johnson et al

Filing 93

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/11/19 ADOPTING 90 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Defendants' request for entry of judgment pursuant to Rule 54(b) 77 is DENIED. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MONTE L. HANEY, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:16-cv-01173 TLN KJN v. ORDER S. JOHNSON, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 01, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 90.) Neither 23 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304(f), this 25 Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 26 Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and the magistrate 27 judge’s analysis. 28 /// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed August 01, 2019 (ECF No .90), are adopted in 3 4 5 6 7 full; 2. Defendants’ request for entry of judgment pursuant to Rule 54(b) (ECF No. 77) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 11, 2019 8 9 10 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?