Haney v. Johnson et al
Filing
93
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/11/19 ADOPTING 90 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Defendants' request for entry of judgment pursuant to Rule 54(b) 77 is DENIED. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MONTE L. HANEY,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:16-cv-01173 TLN KJN
v.
ORDER
S. JOHNSON, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On August 01, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
20
21
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
22
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 90.) Neither
23
party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
24
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304(f), this
25
Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
26
Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and the magistrate
27
judge’s analysis.
28
///
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed August 01, 2019 (ECF No .90), are adopted in
3
4
5
6
7
full;
2. Defendants’ request for entry of judgment pursuant to Rule 54(b) (ECF No. 77) is
DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 11, 2019
8
9
10
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?