Habtemariam v. PNC Bank, National Association, et al.

Filing 73

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 9/18/17 EXTENDING the time for Defendant PNC BANK, N.A., to respond toPlaintiff's Second Amended Complaint up to and including 9/18/17.(Becknal, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Brian H. Gunn (SBN 192594)
[e-mail]
Joshua M. Bryan (SBN 225230)
[e-mail]
WOLFE & WYMAN LLP
980 9th Street, Suite 2350
Sacramento, California 95814
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
PNC BANK, N.A.

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT – EASTERN DISTRICT

9

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

10
11

GENET HABTEMARIAM,

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Case No.: 2:16-cv-01189-MCE-GGH

Plaintiff,
v.
VIDA CAPITAL GROUP, LLC; US MORTGAGE
RESOLUTION; PNC BANK, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION S/B/M NATIONAL CITY
MORTGAGE and DOES 1 to 50, inclusive,

ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANTS
TIME TO RESPOND
TO PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT

Defendants.

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, pursuant to the Stipulation between Plaintiff and Defendant
PNC BANK, N.A.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time for Defendant PNC BANK, N.A., to respond to
Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint shall be and hereby is extended up to and including
September 18, 2017.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 18, 2017

26
27
28
1

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR RESPONSE TO 2ND AMENDED COMPLAINT
2845372.1