Wright v. Target Corporation
Filing
21
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 2/6/2018 DISMISSING CASE with prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (York, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Michael R. Mordaunt, Esq., Bar No. 66911
Lori A. Reihl, Esq., Bar No. 246395
RIGGIO MORDAUNT & KELLY
A Professional Law Corporation
Mailing: Post Office Box 7608 (Zip Code 95267)
Physical: 2509 West March Lane, Suite 200
Stockton, CA 95207
Telephone: (209) 473-8732
Attorneys for Defendant
TARGET CORPORATION
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
SHERON R. WRIGHT,
Case No. 2:16-CV-01193-JAM-CKD
Plaintiff(s),
12
13
vs.
14
TARGET CORPORATION,
15
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE; ORDER
Defendant(s).
16
17
18
Pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Sheron R. Wright and
Defendant Target Corporation, through their respective undersigned counsel of record, hereby
19
stipulate and agree that the above-captioned matter is dismissed with prejudice.
Dated: January 18, 2018
AMERIO LAW FIRM
20
By:
/s/ JEFFREY FLETTERICK
Jeffrey Fletterick, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiff SHERON R. WRIGHT
21
22
23 Dated: February 5, 2018
24
RIGGIO MORDAUNT & KELLY
By:
/s/ LORI A. REIHL
Lori A. Reihl, Esq.
Attorneys for Defendant TARGET CORPORATION
25
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
28
Dated: 2/6/2018
/s/ John A. Mendez_________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
1
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE; ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?