Wright v. Target Corporation

Filing 21

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 2/6/2018 DISMISSING CASE with prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (York, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Michael R. Mordaunt, Esq., Bar No. 66911 Lori A. Reihl, Esq., Bar No. 246395 RIGGIO MORDAUNT & KELLY A Professional Law Corporation Mailing: Post Office Box 7608 (Zip Code 95267) Physical: 2509 West March Lane, Suite 200 Stockton, CA 95207 Telephone: (209) 473-8732 Attorneys for Defendant TARGET CORPORATION 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHERON R. WRIGHT, Case No. 2:16-CV-01193-JAM-CKD Plaintiff(s), 12 13 vs. 14 TARGET CORPORATION, 15 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; ORDER Defendant(s). 16 17 18 Pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Sheron R. Wright and Defendant Target Corporation, through their respective undersigned counsel of record, hereby 19 stipulate and agree that the above-captioned matter is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: January 18, 2018 AMERIO LAW FIRM 20 By: /s/ JEFFREY FLETTERICK Jeffrey Fletterick, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff SHERON R. WRIGHT 21 22 23 Dated: February 5, 2018 24 RIGGIO MORDAUNT & KELLY By: /s/ LORI A. REIHL Lori A. Reihl, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant TARGET CORPORATION 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 28 Dated: 2/6/2018 /s/ John A. Mendez_________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 1 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE; ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?