Fruits v. Shasta County Sheriffs

Filing 41

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/10/18 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JOHN P. FRUITS,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:16-cv-1204 MCE KJN P

v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

SHASTA COUNTY SHERIFF, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

By order filed April 3, 2018, plaintiff was ordered to show cause, within thirty days, why

18

this action should not be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not

19

shown cause or otherwise responded to the court’s order.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

20
21

prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

22

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

23

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

24

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

25

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings

26

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified

27

////

28

////
1

1

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153

2

(9th Cir. 1991).

3

Dated: May 10, 2018

4
5
/frui1204.fsc

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2