Intharinh v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 20

STIPULATION and ORDER FOR A SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 5/3/17. The New due date for Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment will be Friday 6/2/2017. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 PHILIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney DEBORAH LEE STACHEL Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration MICHAEL K. MARRIOTT, CSBN 280890 Special Assistant United States Attorney 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8985 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 E-Mail: Michael.Marriott@ssa.gov Attorneys for Defendant 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 12 13 JASMINE SUZI INTHARINH, 14 Plaintiff, 15 v. 16 17 18 NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 19 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 2:16-cv-01236-CMK STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR A SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE HER MSJ 20 21 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, and with the approval of the Court, that 22 Defendant shall have a second extension of time of 30 days to file her MSJ. Defendant 23 respectfully requests this additional time because of a very heavy workload, including a Ninth 24 Circuit merits brief that is taking more time than expected, as well as four other District Court 25 merits briefs upcoming in the next two weeks. 26 The new due date for Defendant’s MSJ will be Friday, June 2, 2017. 27 28 1 Respectfully submitted, 1 2 Date: May 2, 2017 By: 3 4 /s/ Young Chul Cho* YOUNG CHUL CHO * By email authorization on May 2, 2017 Attorney for Plaintiff 5 6 Date: May 2, 2017 7 PHILIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney By: 8 9 /s/ Michael K. Marriott MICHAEL K. MARRIOTT Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant 10 11 12 13 14 15 ORDER 16 17 APPROVED AND SO ORDERED: 18 19 Dated: May 3, 2017 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?