Intharinh v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
20
STIPULATION and ORDER FOR A SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 5/3/17. The New due date for Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment will be Friday 6/2/2017. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
PHILIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
DEBORAH LEE STACHEL
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
MICHAEL K. MARRIOTT, CSBN 280890
Special Assistant United States Attorney
160 Spear Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 977-8985
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
E-Mail: Michael.Marriott@ssa.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
12
13
JASMINE SUZI INTHARINH,
14
Plaintiff,
15
v.
16
17
18
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
19
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil No. 2:16-cv-01236-CMK
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR A
SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
DEFENDANT TO FILE HER MSJ
20
21
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, and with the approval of the Court, that
22
Defendant shall have a second extension of time of 30 days to file her MSJ. Defendant
23
respectfully requests this additional time because of a very heavy workload, including a Ninth
24
Circuit merits brief that is taking more time than expected, as well as four other District Court
25
merits briefs upcoming in the next two weeks.
26
The new due date for Defendant’s MSJ will be Friday, June 2, 2017.
27
28
1
Respectfully submitted,
1
2
Date: May 2, 2017
By:
3
4
/s/ Young Chul Cho*
YOUNG CHUL CHO
* By email authorization on May 2, 2017
Attorney for Plaintiff
5
6
Date: May 2, 2017
7
PHILIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
By:
8
9
/s/ Michael K. Marriott
MICHAEL K. MARRIOTT
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant
10
11
12
13
14
15
ORDER
16
17
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED:
18
19
Dated: May 3, 2017
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?