Puppo v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Filing 14

STIPULATION and ORDER to Dismiss Action With Prejudice 13 signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 9/14/2017. Civil Case Terminated. CASE CLOSED. (Kirksey Smith, K)

Download PDF
Anthony S. Petru (SBN 91399) HILDEBRAND, McLEOD & NELSON LLP 350 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, 4th Floor Oakland, CA 94612-2006 TEL: (510) 451-6732 FAX: (510) 475-87023 Attorneys for Plaintiff JORDAN PUPPO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SACRAMENTO DIVISION JORDAN J. PUPPO, Plaintiff, vs. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a corporation, and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:16-CV-01253-WBSCMK STIPULATION TO DISMISS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER TO THIS HONORABLE COURT: PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(a)(1)(A(ii), it is hereby stipulated by and between the parties herein, that the above-entitled matter may be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety and that each party will bear their own costs. DATED: September 14, 2017 HILDEBRAND, McLEOD & NELSON LLP By:/s/ Anthony S. Petru ANTHONY S. PETRU, ESQ. Attorneys for Plaintiff JORDAN PUPPO 1 Notice of Dismissal and Order UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY By: /s/ John D. Fenney JOHN D. FENNEY Attorneys for Defendant UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY ORDER In light of the foregoing stipulation by and between the parties herein, and good cause appearing therefore: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. Dated: September 14, 2017 2 Notice of Dismissal and Order

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?