Puppo v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
Filing
14
STIPULATION and ORDER to Dismiss Action With Prejudice 13 signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 9/14/2017. Civil Case Terminated. CASE CLOSED. (Kirksey Smith, K)
Anthony S. Petru (SBN 91399)
HILDEBRAND, McLEOD & NELSON LLP
350 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, 4th Floor
Oakland, CA 94612-2006
TEL: (510) 451-6732
FAX: (510) 475-87023
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JORDAN PUPPO
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SACRAMENTO DIVISION
JORDAN J. PUPPO,
Plaintiff,
vs.
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD
COMPANY, a corporation, and DOES 1
through 20, inclusive,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 2:16-CV-01253-WBSCMK
STIPULATION TO DISMISS
ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AND
ORDER
TO THIS HONORABLE COURT:
PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(a)(1)(A(ii), it is hereby stipulated by and between the
parties herein, that the above-entitled matter may be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety and
that each party will bear their own costs.
DATED: September 14, 2017
HILDEBRAND, McLEOD & NELSON LLP
By:/s/ Anthony S. Petru
ANTHONY S. PETRU, ESQ.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JORDAN PUPPO
1
Notice of Dismissal and Order
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
By: /s/ John D. Fenney
JOHN D. FENNEY
Attorneys for Defendant
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
ORDER
In light of the foregoing stipulation by and between the parties herein, and good cause
appearing therefore: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its
entirety.
Dated: September 14, 2017
2
Notice of Dismissal and Order
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?