Maling v. Johnson et al
Filing
36
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/19/2017 ADOPTING 32 Findings and Recommendations in full and DENYNG 31 Motion to Make Additional Findings and Amend the Judgment. (York, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
EZRA DAVID GIPAN MALING,
11
12
13
No. 2:16-cv-1263-JAM-EFB P
Petitioner,
v.
ORDER
JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, et al.,
14
Respondents.
15
16
Petitioner brought this action for writ of habeas corpus seeking release from immigration
17
detention. The petition was denied and judgment was entered accordingly on July 17, 2017. ECF
18
Nos. 29, 30. On July 31, 2017, petitioner filed a “Motion to Make Additional Findings and
19
Amend the Judgment.” ECF No. 31. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge
20
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
21
On September 5, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
22
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
23
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Petitioner has filed
24
objections to the findings and recommendations.
25
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
26
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
27
court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
28
analysis.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed September 5, 2017, are adopted in full; and
3
2. Petitioner’s July 31, 2017 “Motion to Make Additional Findings and Amend the
4
Judgment” (ECF No. 31) is DENIED.
5
DATED: 12/19/2017
6
/s/ John A. Mendez_______________________
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?