Comcast of Sacramento I, LLC et al v. Sacramento Metropolitan Cable Television Commission

Filing 36

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 5/23/2017: Within 14 days of the date this Order is signed, the parties shall either file an agreed upon form of judgment requested by the court in its 31 Order dated 4/5/2017, or plaintiffs shall file a brief fully stating their position on the amount of payment they are entitled to under the 4/5/2017 Order. Defendant may file a brief opposing plaintiffs' position within 7 days after plaintiffs file their brief. The court will inform t he parties if an oral hearing is necessary to resolve the issue of the amount of payment due to plaintiffs under the 4/5/2017 Order. Plaintiffs' request for further briefing and oral argument on the question of whether plaintiffs are entitled to deduct fees imposed pursuant to California Public Utilities Code section 441 from state franchise fees is DENIED. (Kirksey Smith, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
----oo0oo----

11
12
13
14

COMCAST OF SACRAMENTO I, LLC;
COMCAST OF SACRAMENTO II,
LLC; and COMCAST OF
SACRAMENTO III, LLC;

CIV. NO. 2:16-cv-1264 WBS EFB
ORDER

Plaintiffs,

15
16
17
18
19

v.
SACRAMENTO METROPOLITAN CABLE
TELEVISION COMMISSION and
DOES 1 through 20,
Defendant.

20
21
22

----oo0oo---Within fourteen days of the date this Order is signed:

23

the parties shall either file an agreed upon form of judgment

24

requested by the court in its Order of April 5, 2017, or

25

plaintiffs shall file a brief fully stating their position on the

26

amount of payment they are entitled to under the April 5 order.

27

Defendant may file a brief opposing plaintiffs’ position within

28

seven days after plaintiffs file their brief.
1

The court will

1

inform the parties if an oral hearing is necessary to resolve the

2

issue of the amount of payment due to plaintiffs under the April

3

5 order.

4

Plaintiffs’ request for further briefing and oral

5

argument on the question of whether plaintiffs are entitled to

6

deduct fees imposed pursuant to California Public Utilities Code

7

section 441 from state franchise fees is denied.

8
9

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

May 23, 2017

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2