Comcast of Sacramento I, LLC et al v. Sacramento Metropolitan Cable Television Commission
Filing
38
JUDGMENT signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 6/6/2017. (Zignago, K.)
1 COOPER, WHITE & COOPER LLP
JILL B. ROWE (SBN 197713)
2 PATRICK M. ROSVALL (SBN 217468)
SCOTT M. McLEOD (SBN 242035)
3 201 California Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
(415) 433-1900
4 Telephone:
Facsimile:
(415) 433-5530
5
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Comcast of Sacramento I,
6 LLC; Comcast of Sacramento II, LLC; and
Comcast of Sacramento III, LLC
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION
10
11 COMCAST OF SACRAMENTO I, LLC, a
California limited liability company;
12 COMCAST OF SACRAMENTO II, LLC, a
California limited liability company; and
13 COMCAST OF SACRAMENTO III, LLC, a
California limited liability company,
14
Plaintiffs,
15
vs.
16
SACRAMENTO METROPOLITAN CABLE
17 TELEVISION COMMISSION, and DOES
ONE through TWENTY,
18
Defendants.
19
20
CASE NO. 2:16-cv-01264-WBS-EFB
JUDGMENT
The Hon. William B. Shubb
This matter came on regularly for hearing on the parties' cross-motions for summary
21 judgment on April 3, 2017. On April 5, 2017, the Court entered its Memorandum and Order
22 granting in part and denying in part each such cross-motion. [Docket No. 31] On April 19, 2017,
23 Plaintiffs requested further briefing and oral argument prior to entry of judgment. [Docket No. 33]
24 The Court denied Plaintiffs' request for further briefing on May 23, 2017. [Docket No. 36] The
25 Court's May 23, 2017 order required the parties to either file an agreed upon form of judgment
26 consistent with the Court's April 5, 2017 Memorandum and Order re: Motion and Cross-Motion
27 for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 31], or file separate briefs stating their respective positions.
28 In compliance with the Court's orders, and without waiving any rights to reconsideration or
COOPER, WHITE
& COOPER LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
201 CALIFORNIA STREET
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-5002
1136493.2
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
1 appeal, the parties jointly submit this form of judgment.
2
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that:
3
Plaintiffs Comcast of Sacramento I, LLC; Comcast of Sacramento II, LLC; and Comcast
4 of Sacramento III, LLC shall recover from Defendant Sacramento Metropolitan Cable Television
5 Commission the following amounts:
a.
6
one hundred sixty one thousand one hundred four dollars and sixty seven cents
7 ($161,104.67) through June 7, 2017; plus
b.
8
twenty-six dollars and sixty-eight cents ($26.68) for each day from June 8, 2017
9 through the date of entry of judgment; plus
c.
10
interest on the above sums at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum from the date
11 of entry of this judgment until the date the judgment is paid.
12 Dated: June 6, 2017
13
14
15
16
17
18 Approved as to Form:
19 BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP
20
21 By /s/ Harriet A. Steiner (as authorized on June 5, 2017)
Harriet A. Steiner
22
Attorneys for Defendant Sacramento Metropolitan
Cable Television Commission
23
24 Approved as to Form:
25
COOPER, WHITE & COOPER LLP
26
27
By /s/ Jill B. Rowe
28
COOPER, WHITE
& COOPER LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
201 CALIFORNIA STREET
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-5002
1136493.2
2
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
1
2
Jill B. Rowe
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Comcast of
Sacramento I, LLC; Comcast of Sacramento
II, LLC; and Comcast of Sacramento III, LLC
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COOPER, WHITE
& COOPER LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
201 CALIFORNIA STREET
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-5002
1136493.2
3
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?