Comcast of Sacramento I, LLC et al v. Sacramento Metropolitan Cable Television Commission

Filing 57

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 6/25/2019: Pursuant to the Ninth Circuit's opinion dated 5/8/2019 55 , plaintiffs' Complaint 1 is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiffs have twenty days from the date this Order is signed to file a First Amended Complaint, if they can do so consistent with the Ninth Circuit's opinion. (Kirksey Smith, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
----oo0oo----

11
12
13
14

COMCAST OF SACRAMENTO I, LLC;
COMCAST OF SACRAMENTO II,
LLC; and COMCAST OF
SACRAMENTO III, LLC;
Plaintiffs,

No. 2:16-cv-1264 WBS EFB

ORDER

15
16
17
18

v.
SACRAMENTO METROPOLITAN CABLE
TELEVISION COMMISSION and
DOES 1 through 20,
Defendant.

19
20

----oo0oo----

21
22

Pursuant to the Ninth Circuit’s opinion dated May 8,

23

2019 (Docket No. 55),1 plaintiffs’ Complaint (Docket No. 1) is

24

hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

25

from the date this Order is signed to file a First Amended

26

Complaint, if they can do so consistent with the Ninth Circuit’s

Plaintiffs have twenty days

27
28

1

The mandate issued on May 30, 2019.
1

(Docket No. 56.)

1

opinion.

2
3

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

June 25, 2019

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2