Standen v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 22

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/25/2017 ORDERING the Commissioner of Social Security to respond to the 18 Motion for Summary Judgment by 6/5/2017; EXTENDING all subsequent deadlines set forth in the Court's 3 Scheduling Order accordingly. (Michel, G.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney DEBORAH LEE STACHEL Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration BEATRICE NA, CSBN 303390 Special Assistant United States Attorney Social Security Administration Office of the General Counsel 160 Spear St Ste 800 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8967 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 E-mail: Attorneys for Defendant 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 13 14 MICHAEL STANDEN, 15 Plaintiff, 16 17 18 19 vs. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) Case No. 2:16-cv-01267-EFB ) ) JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ) ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 20 21 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective 22 counsel of record, that Defendant’s time for responding to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary 23 Judgment be extended from April 21, 2017 to June 5, 2017. This is Defendant’s first request for 24 an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment. 25 Defendant requests this extension due to her counsel’s heavy workload. Defendant’s 26 counsel is currently responsible for conducting discovery in a personnel-related litigation 27 pending before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), which required 28 deposition of a key witness in the litigation and which further requires review of Complainant’s Joint Stip. & Prop. Order for Ext.; 2:16-cv-1267-EFB 1 1 responses to agency’s discovery requests and numerous documents in order to investigate the 2 relevant facts. Defendant’s counsel is also responsible for an appellate brief for a Social Security 3 case in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, a bankruptcy case before the 4 United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California, and a representative 5 sanctions matter, in addition to at least 35 district court cases in a variety of stages. 6 Defendant’s counsel respectfully requests this additional time to expend the necessary 7 time to review the 806-page record and to evaluate the issues Plaintiff raised, and to submit 8 Defendant’s response to Plaintiff’s motion for review by this Court. 9 10 11 The parties further stipulate that all subsequent deadlines set forth in the Court’s Scheduling Order shall be extended accordingly. The parties stipulate in good faith, with no intent to prolong proceedings unduly. 12 Respectfully submitted, 13 Dated: April 20, 2017 /s/ Jared Walker* (* As authorized via email on April 20, 2017) JARED WALKER 14 15 Attorney for Plaintiff 16 17 Dated: April 20, 2017 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney 18 By: 20 /s/ Beatrice Na BEATRICE NA Special Assistant United States Attorney 21 Attorneys for Defendant 19 22 23 24 ORDER APPROVED AND SO ORDERED. 25 26 Dated: April 25, 2017. 27 28 Joint Stip. & Prop. Order for Ext.; 2:16-cv-1267-EFB 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?